All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: nigel@nigel.suspend2.net,
	Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 7/8] kexec jump: ftrace_enabled_save/restore
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:51:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080811135136.GD28030@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1218417741.30464.23.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 09:22:21AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> Hi, Steven,
> 
> On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 10:30 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> [...]
> > The only problem with this approach is what happens if the user changes 
> > the enabled in between these two calls. This would make ftrace 
> > inconsistent.
> > 
> > I have a patch from the -rt tree that handles what you want. It is 
> > attached below. Not sure how well it will apply to mainline.
> > 
> > I really need to go through the rt patch set and start submitting a bunch 
> > of clean-up/fixes to mainline. We've been meaning to do it, just have been 
> > distracted :-(
> 
> Your version is better in general sense. Thank you very much!
> 
> But in this specific situation of kexec/kjump. The execution environment
> is that other CPUs are disabled, local irq is disabled, and it is not
> permitted to switch to other process. But it is safe and sufficient to
> use non-locked version here.
> 
> So to satisfy both demands, I think it is better to provide both
> version, locked and non-locked. What do you think about that?
> 

Huang,

So you want to use a non-locked version from optimization point of view?
So that we don't end up taking and release a lock?

Thanks
Vivek

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	nigel@nigel.suspend2.net, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	mingo@elte.hu, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Kexec Mailing List <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 7/8] kexec jump: ftrace_enabled_save/restore
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:51:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080811135136.GD28030@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1218417741.30464.23.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 09:22:21AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> Hi, Steven,
> 
> On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 10:30 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> [...]
> > The only problem with this approach is what happens if the user changes 
> > the enabled in between these two calls. This would make ftrace 
> > inconsistent.
> > 
> > I have a patch from the -rt tree that handles what you want. It is 
> > attached below. Not sure how well it will apply to mainline.
> > 
> > I really need to go through the rt patch set and start submitting a bunch 
> > of clean-up/fixes to mainline. We've been meaning to do it, just have been 
> > distracted :-(
> 
> Your version is better in general sense. Thank you very much!
> 
> But in this specific situation of kexec/kjump. The execution environment
> is that other CPUs are disabled, local irq is disabled, and it is not
> permitted to switch to other process. But it is safe and sufficient to
> use non-locked version here.
> 
> So to satisfy both demands, I think it is better to provide both
> version, locked and non-locked. What do you think about that?
> 

Huang,

So you want to use a non-locked version from optimization point of view?
So that we don't end up taking and release a lock?

Thanks
Vivek

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-08-11 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-08  6:52 [PATCH -v2 7/8] kexec jump: ftrace_enabled_save/restore Huang Ying
2008-08-08  6:52 ` Huang Ying
2008-08-08 14:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-08-08 14:17   ` Vivek Goyal
2008-08-08 14:30   ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-08 14:30     ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-11  1:22     ` Huang Ying
2008-08-11  1:22       ` Huang Ying
2008-08-11 12:29       ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-11 12:29         ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-11 13:51       ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2008-08-11 13:51         ` Vivek Goyal
2008-08-12  1:22         ` Huang Ying
2008-08-12  1:22           ` Huang Ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080811135136.GD28030@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.