From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, arnez@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot and UBI
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:02:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808112202.24363.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c9fda240808102218y6461fb6el192dcff7e47c2536@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday 11 August 2008, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> Actually the Samsung implemented the UBI support on U-boot already and
> has used it internally. The big difference is the code base. It's
> based on kernel UBI code. Yes it's not fit well to u-boot ecosystem so
> it created the ubi wrapper for u-boot.
And how does NAND/OneNAND booting with UBI support fit into this? I assume
that you have some size restrictions for the IPL/SPL on your platforms as
well.
<snip>
> I want to know what's the better way if there are two code bases.
>
> Please give any options and comments
As Josh already mentioned, your version might be better suited as a basis for
mainline inclusion because its more feature complete and probably is for a
newer U-Boot version.
So best would be to publish your UBI support too, then we can compare and
decide where to go.
> Thank you,
> Kyungmin Park
>
> P.S., we will post the patches ASAP
Do you have a rough idea when you could publish your patches?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office@denx.de
=====================================================================
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot and UBI
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:02:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808112202.24363.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c9fda240808102218y6461fb6el192dcff7e47c2536@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday 11 August 2008, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> Actually the Samsung implemented the UBI support on U-boot already and
> has used it internally. The big difference is the code base. It's
> based on kernel UBI code. Yes it's not fit well to u-boot ecosystem so
> it created the ubi wrapper for u-boot.
And how does NAND/OneNAND booting with UBI support fit into this? I assume
that you have some size restrictions for the IPL/SPL on your platforms as
well.
<snip>
> I want to know what's the better way if there are two code bases.
>
> Please give any options and comments
As Josh already mentioned, your version might be better suited as a basis for
mainline inclusion because its more feature complete and probably is for a
newer U-Boot version.
So best would be to publish your UBI support too, then we can compare and
decide where to go.
> Thank you,
> Kyungmin Park
>
> P.S., we will post the patches ASAP
Do you have a rough idea when you could publish your patches?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-11 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-08 18:26 U-Boot and UBI Josh Boyer
2008-08-08 18:26 ` [U-Boot] " Josh Boyer
2008-08-08 22:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-08 22:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-11 5:18 ` Kyungmin Park
2008-08-11 5:18 ` Kyungmin Park
2008-08-11 6:42 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-11 6:42 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-11 12:13 ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-11 12:13 ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-11 20:02 ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2008-08-11 20:02 ` Stefan Roese
2008-08-12 10:25 ` Kyungmin Park
2008-08-12 10:25 ` Kyungmin Park
2008-08-12 11:11 ` Stefan Roese
2008-08-12 11:11 ` Stefan Roese
2008-08-12 23:34 ` Kyungmin Park
2008-08-12 23:34 ` Kyungmin Park
2008-08-13 13:20 ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-13 13:20 ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-19 16:35 ` Enrico Scholz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-09 18:05 [U-Boot] u-boot " ed in 92626
2011-09-12 9:53 ` Detlev Zundel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808112202.24363.sr@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=arnez@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kmpark@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.