All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, arnez@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot and UBI
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:02:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808112202.24363.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c9fda240808102218y6461fb6el192dcff7e47c2536@mail.gmail.com>

On Monday 11 August 2008, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> Actually the Samsung implemented the UBI support on U-boot already and
> has used it internally. The big difference is the code base. It's
> based on kernel UBI code. Yes it's not fit well to u-boot ecosystem so
> it created the ubi wrapper for u-boot.

And how does NAND/OneNAND booting with UBI support fit into this? I assume 
that you have some size restrictions for the IPL/SPL on your platforms as 
well.

<snip>

> I want to know what's the better way if there are two code bases.
>
> Please give any options and comments

As Josh already mentioned, your version might be better suited as a basis for 
mainline inclusion because its more feature complete and probably is for a 
newer U-Boot version.

So best would be to publish your UBI support too, then we can compare and 
decide where to go.

> Thank you,
> Kyungmin Park
>
> P.S., we will post the patches ASAP

Do you have a rough idea when you could publish your patches?

Thanks.

Best regards,
Stefan

=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office@denx.de
=====================================================================

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot and UBI
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:02:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808112202.24363.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c9fda240808102218y6461fb6el192dcff7e47c2536@mail.gmail.com>

On Monday 11 August 2008, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> Actually the Samsung implemented the UBI support on U-boot already and
> has used it internally. The big difference is the code base. It's
> based on kernel UBI code. Yes it's not fit well to u-boot ecosystem so
> it created the ubi wrapper for u-boot.

And how does NAND/OneNAND booting with UBI support fit into this? I assume 
that you have some size restrictions for the IPL/SPL on your platforms as 
well.

<snip>

> I want to know what's the better way if there are two code bases.
>
> Please give any options and comments

As Josh already mentioned, your version might be better suited as a basis for 
mainline inclusion because its more feature complete and probably is for a 
newer U-Boot version.

So best would be to publish your UBI support too, then we can compare and 
decide where to go.

> Thank you,
> Kyungmin Park
>
> P.S., we will post the patches ASAP

Do you have a rough idea when you could publish your patches?

Thanks.

Best regards,
Stefan

=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-08-11 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-08 18:26 U-Boot and UBI Josh Boyer
2008-08-08 18:26 ` [U-Boot] " Josh Boyer
2008-08-08 22:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-08 22:58   ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-11  5:18   ` Kyungmin Park
2008-08-11  5:18     ` Kyungmin Park
2008-08-11  6:42     ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-11  6:42       ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-08-11 12:13     ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-11 12:13       ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-11 20:02     ` Stefan Roese [this message]
2008-08-11 20:02       ` Stefan Roese
2008-08-12 10:25       ` Kyungmin Park
2008-08-12 10:25         ` Kyungmin Park
2008-08-12 11:11         ` Stefan Roese
2008-08-12 11:11           ` Stefan Roese
2008-08-12 23:34           ` Kyungmin Park
2008-08-12 23:34             ` Kyungmin Park
2008-08-13 13:20             ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-13 13:20               ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-19 16:35               ` Enrico Scholz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-09 18:05 [U-Boot] u-boot " ed in 92626
2011-09-12  9:53 ` Detlev Zundel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200808112202.24363.sr@denx.de \
    --to=sr@denx.de \
    --cc=arnez@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kmpark@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.