From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@bull.net>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: dwalker@mvista.com, tinytim@us.ibm.com,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, jean-pierre.dion@bull.net,
michael@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
paulus@samba.org, gilles.carry@ext.bull.net, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 15:34:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080903153446.44f2cb64@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1219209726.21386.23.camel@pasglop>
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:22:06 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 15:30 +0200, Sebastien Dugue wrote:
> > The radix trees used by interrupt controllers for their irq reverse mapping
> > (currently only the XICS found on pSeries) have a complex locking scheme
> > dating back to before the advent of the lockless radix tree.
> >
> > Take advantage of this and of the fact that the items of the tree are
> > pointers to a static array (irq_map) elements which can never go under us
> > to simplify the locking.
> >
> > Concurrency between readers and writers is handled by the intrinsic
> > properties of the lockless radix tree. Concurrency between writers is handled
> > with a spinlock added to the irq_host structure.
>
> No need for a spinlock in the irq_host. Make it one global lock, it's
> not like scalability of irq_create_mapping() was a big deal and there's
> usually only one of those type of hosts anyway.
Right, done.
Thanks,
Sebastien.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@bull.net>
> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> > Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq.h | 1 +
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 74 ++++++----------------------------------
> > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq.h
> > index 0a51376..72fd036 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq.h
> > @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ struct irq_host {
> > } linear;
> > struct radix_tree_root tree;
> > } revmap_data;
> > + spinlock_t tree_lock;
> > struct irq_host_ops *ops;
> > void *host_data;
> > irq_hw_number_t inval_irq;
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
> > index dc8663a..7a19103 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
> > @@ -439,8 +439,6 @@ void do_softirq(void)
> >
> > static LIST_HEAD(irq_hosts);
> > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_big_lock);
> > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, irq_radix_reader);
> > -static unsigned int irq_radix_writer;
> > static atomic_t revmap_trees_allocated = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> > struct irq_map_entry irq_map[NR_IRQS];
> > static unsigned int irq_virq_count = NR_IRQS;
> > @@ -584,57 +582,6 @@ void irq_set_virq_count(unsigned int count)
> > irq_virq_count = count;
> > }
> >
> > -/* radix tree not lockless safe ! we use a brlock-type mecanism
> > - * for now, until we can use a lockless radix tree
> > - */
> > -static void irq_radix_wrlock(unsigned long *flags)
> > -{
> > - unsigned int cpu, ok;
> > -
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_big_lock, *flags);
> > - irq_radix_writer = 1;
> > - smp_mb();
> > - do {
> > - barrier();
> > - ok = 1;
> > - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > - if (per_cpu(irq_radix_reader, cpu)) {
> > - ok = 0;
> > - break;
> > - }
> > - }
> > - if (!ok)
> > - cpu_relax();
> > - } while(!ok);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void irq_radix_wrunlock(unsigned long flags)
> > -{
> > - smp_wmb();
> > - irq_radix_writer = 0;
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_big_lock, flags);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void irq_radix_rdlock(unsigned long *flags)
> > -{
> > - local_irq_save(*flags);
> > - __get_cpu_var(irq_radix_reader) = 1;
> > - smp_mb();
> > - if (likely(irq_radix_writer == 0))
> > - return;
> > - __get_cpu_var(irq_radix_reader) = 0;
> > - smp_wmb();
> > - spin_lock(&irq_big_lock);
> > - __get_cpu_var(irq_radix_reader) = 1;
> > - spin_unlock(&irq_big_lock);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void irq_radix_rdunlock(unsigned long flags)
> > -{
> > - __get_cpu_var(irq_radix_reader) = 0;
> > - local_irq_restore(flags);
> > -}
> > -
> > static int irq_setup_virq(struct irq_host *host, unsigned int virq,
> > irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> > {
> > @@ -789,7 +736,6 @@ void irq_dispose_mapping(unsigned int virq)
> > {
> > struct irq_host *host;
> > irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> > - unsigned long flags;
> >
> > if (virq == NO_IRQ)
> > return;
> > @@ -825,9 +771,9 @@ void irq_dispose_mapping(unsigned int virq)
> > /* Check if radix tree allocated yet */
> > if (atomic_read(&revmap_trees_allocated) == 0)
> > break;
> > - irq_radix_wrlock(&flags);
> > + spin_lock(&host->tree_lock);
> > radix_tree_delete(&host->revmap_data.tree, hwirq);
> > - irq_radix_wrunlock(flags);
> > + spin_unlock(&host->tree_lock);
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -881,7 +827,6 @@ unsigned int irq_radix_revmap_lookup(struct irq_host *host,
> > {
> > struct irq_map_entry *ptr;
> > unsigned int virq = NO_IRQ;
> > - unsigned long flags;
> >
> > WARN_ON(host->revmap_type != IRQ_HOST_MAP_TREE);
> >
> > @@ -893,9 +838,11 @@ unsigned int irq_radix_revmap_lookup(struct irq_host *host,
> > return irq_find_mapping(host, hwirq);
> >
> > /* Now try to resolve */
> > - irq_radix_rdlock(&flags);
> > + /*
> > + * No rcu_read_lock(ing) needed, the ptr returned can't go under us
> > + * as it's referencing an entry in the static irq_map table.
> > + */
> > ptr = radix_tree_lookup(&host->revmap_data.tree, hwirq);
> > - irq_radix_rdunlock(flags);
> >
> > /* Found it, return */
> > if (ptr)
> > @@ -907,7 +854,6 @@ unsigned int irq_radix_revmap_lookup(struct irq_host *host,
> > void irq_radix_revmap_insert(struct irq_host *host, unsigned int virq,
> > irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> > {
> > - unsigned long flags;
> >
> > WARN_ON(host->revmap_type != IRQ_HOST_MAP_TREE);
> >
> > @@ -920,10 +866,10 @@ void irq_radix_revmap_insert(struct irq_host *host, unsigned int virq,
> > return;
> >
> > if (virq != NO_IRQ) {
> > - irq_radix_wrlock(&flags);
> > + spin_lock(&host->tree_lock);
> > radix_tree_insert(&host->revmap_data.tree, hwirq,
> > &irq_map[virq]);
> > - irq_radix_wrunlock(flags);
> > + spin_unlock(&host->tree_lock);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1041,8 +987,10 @@ static int irq_late_init(void)
> > * revmap_trees_allocated.
> > */
> > list_for_each_entry(h, &irq_hosts, link) {
> > - if (h->revmap_type == IRQ_HOST_MAP_TREE)
> > + if (h->revmap_type == IRQ_HOST_MAP_TREE) {
> > INIT_RADIX_TREE(&h->revmap_data.tree, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + spin_lock_init(&h->tree_lock);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /*
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@bull.net>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
michael@ellerman.id.au, jean-pierre.dion@bull.net,
gilles.carry@ext.bull.net, tinytim@us.ibm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, dwalker@mvista.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 15:34:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080903153446.44f2cb64@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1219209726.21386.23.camel@pasglop>
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:22:06 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 15:30 +0200, Sebastien Dugue wrote:
> > The radix trees used by interrupt controllers for their irq reverse mapping
> > (currently only the XICS found on pSeries) have a complex locking scheme
> > dating back to before the advent of the lockless radix tree.
> >
> > Take advantage of this and of the fact that the items of the tree are
> > pointers to a static array (irq_map) elements which can never go under us
> > to simplify the locking.
> >
> > Concurrency between readers and writers is handled by the intrinsic
> > properties of the lockless radix tree. Concurrency between writers is handled
> > with a spinlock added to the irq_host structure.
>
> No need for a spinlock in the irq_host. Make it one global lock, it's
> not like scalability of irq_create_mapping() was a big deal and there's
> usually only one of those type of hosts anyway.
Right, done.
Thanks,
Sebastien.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@bull.net>
> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> > Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq.h | 1 +
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 74 ++++++----------------------------------
> > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq.h
> > index 0a51376..72fd036 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq.h
> > @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ struct irq_host {
> > } linear;
> > struct radix_tree_root tree;
> > } revmap_data;
> > + spinlock_t tree_lock;
> > struct irq_host_ops *ops;
> > void *host_data;
> > irq_hw_number_t inval_irq;
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
> > index dc8663a..7a19103 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
> > @@ -439,8 +439,6 @@ void do_softirq(void)
> >
> > static LIST_HEAD(irq_hosts);
> > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_big_lock);
> > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, irq_radix_reader);
> > -static unsigned int irq_radix_writer;
> > static atomic_t revmap_trees_allocated = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> > struct irq_map_entry irq_map[NR_IRQS];
> > static unsigned int irq_virq_count = NR_IRQS;
> > @@ -584,57 +582,6 @@ void irq_set_virq_count(unsigned int count)
> > irq_virq_count = count;
> > }
> >
> > -/* radix tree not lockless safe ! we use a brlock-type mecanism
> > - * for now, until we can use a lockless radix tree
> > - */
> > -static void irq_radix_wrlock(unsigned long *flags)
> > -{
> > - unsigned int cpu, ok;
> > -
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_big_lock, *flags);
> > - irq_radix_writer = 1;
> > - smp_mb();
> > - do {
> > - barrier();
> > - ok = 1;
> > - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > - if (per_cpu(irq_radix_reader, cpu)) {
> > - ok = 0;
> > - break;
> > - }
> > - }
> > - if (!ok)
> > - cpu_relax();
> > - } while(!ok);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void irq_radix_wrunlock(unsigned long flags)
> > -{
> > - smp_wmb();
> > - irq_radix_writer = 0;
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_big_lock, flags);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void irq_radix_rdlock(unsigned long *flags)
> > -{
> > - local_irq_save(*flags);
> > - __get_cpu_var(irq_radix_reader) = 1;
> > - smp_mb();
> > - if (likely(irq_radix_writer == 0))
> > - return;
> > - __get_cpu_var(irq_radix_reader) = 0;
> > - smp_wmb();
> > - spin_lock(&irq_big_lock);
> > - __get_cpu_var(irq_radix_reader) = 1;
> > - spin_unlock(&irq_big_lock);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void irq_radix_rdunlock(unsigned long flags)
> > -{
> > - __get_cpu_var(irq_radix_reader) = 0;
> > - local_irq_restore(flags);
> > -}
> > -
> > static int irq_setup_virq(struct irq_host *host, unsigned int virq,
> > irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> > {
> > @@ -789,7 +736,6 @@ void irq_dispose_mapping(unsigned int virq)
> > {
> > struct irq_host *host;
> > irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> > - unsigned long flags;
> >
> > if (virq == NO_IRQ)
> > return;
> > @@ -825,9 +771,9 @@ void irq_dispose_mapping(unsigned int virq)
> > /* Check if radix tree allocated yet */
> > if (atomic_read(&revmap_trees_allocated) == 0)
> > break;
> > - irq_radix_wrlock(&flags);
> > + spin_lock(&host->tree_lock);
> > radix_tree_delete(&host->revmap_data.tree, hwirq);
> > - irq_radix_wrunlock(flags);
> > + spin_unlock(&host->tree_lock);
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -881,7 +827,6 @@ unsigned int irq_radix_revmap_lookup(struct irq_host *host,
> > {
> > struct irq_map_entry *ptr;
> > unsigned int virq = NO_IRQ;
> > - unsigned long flags;
> >
> > WARN_ON(host->revmap_type != IRQ_HOST_MAP_TREE);
> >
> > @@ -893,9 +838,11 @@ unsigned int irq_radix_revmap_lookup(struct irq_host *host,
> > return irq_find_mapping(host, hwirq);
> >
> > /* Now try to resolve */
> > - irq_radix_rdlock(&flags);
> > + /*
> > + * No rcu_read_lock(ing) needed, the ptr returned can't go under us
> > + * as it's referencing an entry in the static irq_map table.
> > + */
> > ptr = radix_tree_lookup(&host->revmap_data.tree, hwirq);
> > - irq_radix_rdunlock(flags);
> >
> > /* Found it, return */
> > if (ptr)
> > @@ -907,7 +854,6 @@ unsigned int irq_radix_revmap_lookup(struct irq_host *host,
> > void irq_radix_revmap_insert(struct irq_host *host, unsigned int virq,
> > irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> > {
> > - unsigned long flags;
> >
> > WARN_ON(host->revmap_type != IRQ_HOST_MAP_TREE);
> >
> > @@ -920,10 +866,10 @@ void irq_radix_revmap_insert(struct irq_host *host, unsigned int virq,
> > return;
> >
> > if (virq != NO_IRQ) {
> > - irq_radix_wrlock(&flags);
> > + spin_lock(&host->tree_lock);
> > radix_tree_insert(&host->revmap_data.tree, hwirq,
> > &irq_map[virq]);
> > - irq_radix_wrunlock(flags);
> > + spin_unlock(&host->tree_lock);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1041,8 +987,10 @@ static int irq_late_init(void)
> > * revmap_trees_allocated.
> > */
> > list_for_each_entry(h, &irq_hosts, link) {
> > - if (h->revmap_type == IRQ_HOST_MAP_TREE)
> > + if (h->revmap_type == IRQ_HOST_MAP_TREE) {
> > INIT_RADIX_TREE(&h->revmap_data.tree, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + spin_lock_init(&h->tree_lock);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /*
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-03 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-06 13:30 [PATCH 0/2 V3] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping tree lockless Sebastien Dugue
2008-08-06 13:30 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-08-06 13:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc - Separate the irq radix tree insertion and lookup Sebastien Dugue
2008-08-06 13:30 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-08-20 5:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-20 5:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-03 13:34 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-03 13:34 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-08-06 13:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless Sebastien Dugue
2008-08-06 13:30 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-08-20 5:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-20 5:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-03 13:34 ` Sebastien Dugue [this message]
2008-09-03 13:34 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-08-20 5:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-20 5:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-03 13:41 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-03 13:41 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-04 2:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-04 2:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-04 7:22 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-04 7:22 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-04 7:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-04 7:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-04 7:55 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-04 7:55 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-04 7:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-04 7:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-04 8:04 ` Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-04 8:04 ` Sebastien Dugue
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-04 12:37 [PATCH 0/2 V4] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping " Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-04 12:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix " Sebastien Dugue
2008-09-04 12:37 ` Sebastien Dugue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080903153446.44f2cb64@bull.net \
--to=sebastien.dugue@bull.net \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=gilles.carry@ext.bull.net \
--cc=jean-pierre.dion@bull.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tinytim@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.