From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@infradead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 0/4] TSC calibration improvements
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:36:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080904153620.GC7120@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080904150339.896115280@linutronix.de>
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> This patch series addresses following:
>
> - reduce the calibration time to a useful value
> - make decision smarter, when a reference (HPET/PMTIMER) is around
>
> The first patches are cleanups to prepare for the smarter loop
> handling.
>
> The main change is to reduce the PIT delay value to 10ms, which gives
> reasonable results on very slow machines as well. To avoid looping
> several times when the machine has a working reference counter
> (HPET/pmtimer), we compare the results of the PIT and the reference and
> break out of the loop when both match inside of a 10% window.
>
> For virtualized environments the PIT calibration fails often and the
> reference calibration is not reproducible with 10ms. To address this
> we check whether the PIT failed two times in a row and make the PIT
> loop longer (50ms) for the last try to get a better result for the
> reference.
>
> Most of the machines I tested break out of the loop after the first
> try with a stable reproducible result.
i've added them to tip/x86/tsc and merged it into tip/master - if
there's test success we can merge it into x86/urgent as well and push it
into v2.6.27. Any objections to that merge route?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-04 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-04 15:18 [RFC patch 0/4] TSC calibration improvements Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-04 15:18 ` [RFC patch 1/4] x86: TSC: define the PIT latch value separate Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-04 15:18 ` [RFC patch 2/4] x86: TSC: separate hpet/pmtimer calculation out Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-04 15:18 ` [RFC patch 3/4] x86: TSC: use one set of reference variables Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-04 15:18 ` [RFC patch 4/4] x86: TSC make the calibration loop smarter Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-04 15:36 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-09-04 15:45 ` [RFC patch 0/4] TSC calibration improvements Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 16:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 16:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 16:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 17:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 18:07 ` Alan Cox
2008-09-04 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 18:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-04 20:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 20:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 20:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 21:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 21:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 21:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 21:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 21:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-04 21:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-05 22:18 ` Alok Kataria
2008-09-05 22:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-06 20:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-06 20:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-06 20:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-06 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-06 20:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-06 21:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-06 21:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-06 21:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-06 22:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-06 20:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-06 21:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-07 6:01 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-09-06 20:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-06 20:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-06 21:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-06 21:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-06 21:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-06 21:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 20:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 21:38 ` Alok Kataria
2008-09-04 21:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 22:09 ` Alok Kataria
2008-09-04 17:39 ` Alok Kataria
2008-09-04 17:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04 18:31 ` Alok Kataria
2008-09-04 18:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-04 21:00 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080904153620.GC7120@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.