All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mention the fact that 'git annotate' is only for backward compatibility.
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 10:07:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080905080759.GN10360@machine.or.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v3akfxd74.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 12:29:51AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> diff --git c/Documentation/git-annotate.txt w/Documentation/git-annotate.txt
> index 8b6b56a..78dc5e2 100644
> --- c/Documentation/git-annotate.txt
> +++ w/Documentation/git-annotate.txt
> @@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ DESCRIPTION
>  Annotates each line in the given file with information from the commit
>  which introduced the line. Optionally annotate from a given revision.
>  
> +The only difference from this command and linkgit:git-blame[1] is that
                       ^^^^ between?
> +they use slightly different output formats, and this command exists only
> +for backward compatibility to support existing scripts, and provide more
> +familiar command name for people coming from other SCM systems.
> +
>  OPTIONS
>  -------
>  include::blame-options.txt[]

I like this one. I'm still not too happy about leaving the command in
the command list and tab completion since I believe reducing the number
of commands (which is still quite intimidating for the user), even just
by a little, is more important than encouraging people to use
compatibility aliases. I don't feel very strongly about it, though.

Acked-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-05  8:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-03 16:43 blame vs annotate? Jonathan del Strother
2008-09-03 17:49 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-09-03 17:54   ` Petr Baudis
2008-09-03 18:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-09-04  9:09   ` Matthieu Moy
2008-09-04  9:16     ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-09-04 12:00       ` [PATCH] Mention the fact that 'git annotate' is only for backward compatibility Matthieu Moy
2008-09-04 12:30         ` Petr Baudis
2008-09-04 13:03           ` Matthieu Moy
2008-09-04 19:12           ` Junio C Hamano
2008-09-04 19:17           ` Junio C Hamano
2008-09-05  6:31             ` Matthieu Moy
2008-09-05  7:29               ` Junio C Hamano
2008-09-05  8:07                 ` Petr Baudis [this message]
2008-09-05 12:06                   ` Matthieu Moy
2008-09-05  7:56           ` Junio C Hamano
2008-09-03 18:11 ` blame vs annotate? Jakub Narebski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080905080759.GN10360@machine.or.cz \
    --to=pasky@suse.cz \
    --cc=Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.