From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
John W Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>,
bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] b43legacy: Fix failure in rate-adjustment mechanism
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 22:31:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080908053155.GI4099@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200809070040.04300.mb@bu3sch.de>
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 12:40:04AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Saturday 06 September 2008 23:51:22 Larry Finger wrote:
> > A coding error present since b43legacy was incorporated into the
> > kernel has prevented the driver from using the rate-setting mechanism
> > of mac80211. The driver has been forced to remain at a 1 Mb/s rate.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> > Cc: Stable <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.26], [2.6.25]
>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
>
> > ---
> >
> > John,
> >
> > This is a bug, not a regression. I guess under the new rules that it
> > is 2.6.28 material.
>
> I wonder what the -stable rules are.
Bug fixes, not new features, it's pretty simple :)
> It seems really screwed to me to avoid applying the fix to 2.6.27,
> but still apply it to 2.6.25/26-stable.
I have to wait until it is in upstream before adding it to the -stable
tree, so this will not happen.
> I'd like to see this patch in .25, .26 and .27, however I'm not sure
> what the rules are.
>
> For reference:
> Three people agree on the correctness of the patch, it's a oneliner
> and it's tested to fix the bug. However it is not a regression. The
> bug is in there since day-0 of b43legacy. But this fix improves
> TX rates a lot.
If it goes into .27, please forward it on to stable@kernel.org so we can
include it in older releases.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-08 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-06 21:51 [PATCH V2] b43legacy: Fix failure in rate-adjustment mechanism Larry Finger
2008-09-06 22:40 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-08 5:31 ` Greg KH [this message]
2008-09-08 12:53 ` Michael Buesch
2008-09-08 16:22 ` Larry Finger
2008-09-08 20:54 ` John W. Linville
2008-09-10 6:40 ` Otto Solares
2008-09-10 13:21 ` John W. Linville
2008-09-10 5:19 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080908053155.GI4099@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.