Re: [PATCH V2] b43legacy: Fix failure in rate-adjustment mechanism

[Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>]

On Monday 08 September 2008 07:31:55 Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 12:40:04AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 September 2008 23:51:22 Larry Finger wrote:
> > > A coding error present since b43legacy was incorporated into the
> > > kernel has prevented the driver from using the rate-setting mechanism
> > > of mac80211. The driver has been forced to remain at a 1 Mb/s rate.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> > > Cc: Stable <stable@kernel.org>		[2.6.26], [2.6.25]
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
> > 
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > John,
> > > 
> > > This is a bug, not a regression. I guess under the new rules that it
> > > is 2.6.28 material.
> > 
> > I wonder what the -stable rules are.
> 
> Bug fixes, not new features, it's pretty simple :)

Yeah, well. My concern was:
- We put it into .25-stable and .26-stable, because it's a bugfix.
  That's perfectly fine.
- We do _not_ put it into .27 mainline, because it is just a simple
  bug, but not a regression. Instead we wait for .27-stable.

Doesn't make a lot sense to me. :)

So I'd like to see it in .27, too, despite the strict regressions-only
rule. A general regressions-only rule simply doesn't always make sense, IMO.

-- 
Greetings Michael.