From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: smpboot - check if we have ESR register in wakeup_secondary_cpu
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:20:07 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080915102007.GB7131@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080915100119.GA7131@lenovo>
[Cyrill Gorcunov - Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 02:01:19PM +0400]
| [Ingo Molnar - Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 09:56:55AM +0200]
| |
| | * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
| |
| | > We should check if we have ESR register before writting to it.
| | >
| | > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
| | > ---
| | >
| | > Please review!
| | > it seems the same nit in do_boot_cpu - checking now.
| | >
| | > Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
| | > ===================================================================
| | > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c 2008-09-14 19:43:03.000000000 +0400
| | > +++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c 2008-09-14 21:49:36.000000000 +0400
| | > @@ -598,10 +598,12 @@ wakeup_secondary_cpu(int logical_apicid,
| | > * Give the other CPU some time to accept the IPI.
| | > */
| | > udelay(200);
| | > - maxlvt = lapic_get_maxlvt();
| | > - if (maxlvt > 3) /* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */
| | > - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
| | > - accept_status = (apic_read(APIC_ESR) & 0xEF);
| | > + if (APIC_INTEGRATED(apic_version[phys_apicid])) {
| | > + maxlvt = lapic_get_maxlvt();
| | > + if (maxlvt > 3) /* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */
| | > + apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
| | > + accept_status = (apic_read(APIC_ESR) & 0xEF);
| | > + }
| | > pr_debug("NMI sent.\n");
| |
| | hm, is there any non-integrated lapic that has more than 3 lvts? iirc
| | lvts were introduced with the integrated lapic.
| |
| | Ingo
| |
|
| Yes Ingo, but don't forget the next line in former
|
| accept_status = (apic_read(APIC_ESR) & 0xEF);
|
| so we're protected in writting but _not_ in reading - which
| is buggy a bit :-)
|
| - Cyrill -
Ingo - could you replace in this patch message and subject -
writting to reading - it will be more correct.
- Cyrill -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-15 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-14 17:58 [PATCH] x86: smpboot - check if we have ESR register in wakeup_secondary_cpu Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-15 7:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-15 10:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-15 10:20 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2008-09-15 14:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080915102007.GB7131@lenovo \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.