From: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: massive unexplained latency in 2.6.27 (rc5, rc6, probably others)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:53:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080919235305.GD11665@tesla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0809191630090.14961@alcarin.uplinklabs.net>
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 04:31:20PM -0700, Steven Noonan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch Senthil. He is on Linus' v2.6.27-rc, you are on
> > wireless-testing so I've ported it (no changes, it just applies cleanly
> > now). This is also untested by me:
>
> I'm seeing the same latency issue I reported originally with the latest
> -tip kernel and WITHOUT irqpoll.
Damn it.
> Apparently there's something else to this...
Steven,
Can you reproduce this? If so can you tell us how? If you can reproduce
can you try to test this with wireless-testing as well? That is still
based on 2.6.26-rc6 but its just has all the new wireless development
stuff queued up for 2.6.28 so far. Everything else is the same.
Luis
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: Steven Noonan <steven@uplinklabs.net>
Cc: Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com>,
Senthilkumar Balasubramanian
<Senthilkumar.Balasubramanian@Atheros.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: massive unexplained latency in 2.6.27 (rc5, rc6, probably others)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:53:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080919235305.GD11665@tesla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0809191630090.14961@alcarin.uplinklabs.net>
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 04:31:20PM -0700, Steven Noonan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch Senthil. He is on Linus' v2.6.27-rc, you are on
> > wireless-testing so I've ported it (no changes, it just applies cleanly
> > now). This is also untested by me:
>
> I'm seeing the same latency issue I reported originally with the latest
> -tip kernel and WITHOUT irqpoll.
Damn it.
> Apparently there's something else to this...
Steven,
Can you reproduce this? If so can you tell us how? If you can reproduce
can you try to test this with wireless-testing as well? That is still
based on 2.6.26-rc6 but its just has all the new wireless development
stuff queued up for 2.6.28 so far. Everything else is the same.
Luis
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: Steven Noonan <steven@uplinklabs.net>
Cc: Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@atheros.com>,
Senthilkumar Balasubramanian
<Senthilkumar.Balasubramanian@atheros.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: massive unexplained latency in 2.6.27 (rc5, rc6, probably others)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:53:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080919235305.GD11665@tesla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0809191630090.14961@alcarin.uplinklabs.net>
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 04:31:20PM -0700, Steven Noonan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch Senthil. He is on Linus' v2.6.27-rc, you are on
> > wireless-testing so I've ported it (no changes, it just applies cleanly
> > now). This is also untested by me:
>
> I'm seeing the same latency issue I reported originally with the latest
> -tip kernel and WITHOUT irqpoll.
Damn it.
> Apparently there's something else to this...
Steven,
Can you reproduce this? If so can you tell us how? If you can reproduce
can you try to test this with wireless-testing as well? That is still
based on 2.6.26-rc6 but its just has all the new wireless development
stuff queued up for 2.6.28 so far. Everything else is the same.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-19 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 192+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-18 18:23 [ath9k-devel] ath9k: massive unexplained latency in 2.6.27 (rc5, rc6, probably others) Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 18:23 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 18:23 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 18:30 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 18:34 ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 18:34 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 18:34 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 18:42 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 18:42 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 18:42 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 19:00 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 19:00 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 19:00 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 19:23 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 19:23 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 19:23 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 20:18 ` Justin Mattock
2008-09-18 20:18 ` Justin Mattock
2008-09-18 20:18 ` Justin Mattock
2008-09-18 20:25 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 20:25 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 20:25 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 20:44 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 20:44 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 20:44 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 21:31 ` Justin Mattock
2008-09-18 21:31 ` Justin Mattock
2008-09-18 21:31 ` Justin Mattock
2008-09-18 21:49 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 21:49 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 21:49 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 22:01 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 22:01 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 22:01 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 22:08 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 22:08 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 22:08 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 23:04 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 23:04 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 23:04 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 23:10 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 23:10 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 23:10 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 23:16 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 23:16 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-18 23:16 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-19 2:52 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 2:52 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 2:52 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 3:01 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-19 3:01 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-19 3:01 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-19 7:29 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 7:29 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 7:29 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-19 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-19 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-19 8:22 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 8:22 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 8:22 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 8:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-19 8:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-19 8:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-27 1:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-27 1:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-27 1:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-27 19:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-27 19:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-27 19:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-27 19:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-27 19:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-27 19:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-19 8:45 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 8:45 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 8:45 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 8:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-19 8:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-19 8:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-19 8:22 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 8:22 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 8:22 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 14:28 ` Senthil Balasubramanian
2008-09-19 14:28 ` Senthil Balasubramanian
2008-09-19 14:28 ` Senthil Balasubramanian
2008-09-19 16:42 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 16:42 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 16:42 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 17:58 ` Senthil Balasubramanian
2008-09-19 17:58 ` Senthil Balasubramanian
2008-09-19 17:58 ` Senthil Balasubramanian
2008-09-19 18:23 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-19 18:23 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-19 18:23 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-19 23:31 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 23:31 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 23:31 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 23:53 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2008-09-19 23:53 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-19 23:53 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 0:01 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 0:01 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 0:01 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 1:13 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 1:13 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 1:13 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 1:15 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 1:15 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 1:15 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 3:29 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 3:29 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 3:29 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 3:40 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 3:40 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 3:40 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 20:56 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 20:56 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 20:56 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 15:21 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 15:21 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 15:21 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 20:57 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 20:57 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 20:57 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 20:58 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-20 20:58 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-20 20:58 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-20 21:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 21:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 21:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 21:22 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 21:22 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 21:22 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 21:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 21:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 21:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 21:48 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 21:48 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 21:48 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-21 1:48 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-21 1:48 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-21 1:48 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-21 15:33 ` Jean Schurger
2008-09-21 17:01 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-22 6:54 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-22 6:54 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-22 6:54 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-22 7:14 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-22 7:14 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-22 7:14 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-22 7:26 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-22 7:26 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-22 7:26 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-22 8:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-22 8:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-22 8:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-22 15:11 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-22 15:11 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-22 15:11 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-22 16:01 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-22 16:01 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-22 16:01 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-23 7:22 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-23 7:22 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-23 7:22 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-23 7:55 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-23 7:55 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-23 7:55 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-23 16:20 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-23 16:20 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-23 16:20 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-23 19:22 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-23 19:22 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-23 19:22 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 21:18 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 21:18 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 21:18 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-20 21:24 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 21:24 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-20 21:24 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 23:08 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 23:08 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 23:08 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-18 23:12 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 23:12 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-09-18 23:12 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
[not found] <fa.jQQm4Iwb0lkAWxV+5FAfTMHY4m4@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.zGA6t2p+jJeMRIaZFOqy1I8En1c@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.AGi3s2gpyC3T3KuCJ8cYQ30teak@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.59AlSLNBuMx/BjQSvR6whwGydbU@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.NwYDTAB59VZjr1quzgR4OU0+8eQ@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.tRre/FoeQKwChGwdusnYJgwjRmw@ifi.uio.no>
2008-09-19 14:46 ` Robert Hancock
2008-09-19 14:46 ` Robert Hancock
2008-09-19 14:46 ` Robert Hancock
2008-09-19 16:27 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 16:27 ` Steven Noonan
2008-09-19 16:27 ` Steven Noonan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080919235305.GD11665@tesla \
--to=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.