All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
To: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	jmoriss@namei.org, serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, safford@watson.ibm.com,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] TPM: rcu locking
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:29:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080925132932.GA13414@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1222190371-23814-3-git-send-email-srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Quoting Rajiv Andrade (srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> Protects tpm_chip_list when transversing it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c |   58 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>  1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
> index dfd4e7f..ac8982e 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
> @@ -961,33 +961,27 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_store_cancel);
>   */
>  int tpm_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  {
> -	int rc = 0, minor = iminor(inode);
> +	int minor = iminor(inode);
>  	struct tpm_chip *chip = NULL, *pos;
> 
> -	spin_lock(&driver_lock);
> -
> -	list_for_each_entry(pos, &tpm_chip_list, list) {
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(pos, &tpm_chip_list, list) {
>  		if (pos->vendor.miscdev.minor == minor) {
>  			chip = pos;
> +			get_device(chip->dev);
>  			break;
>  		}
>  	}
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> 
> -	if (chip == NULL) {
> -		rc = -ENODEV;
> -		goto err_out;
> -	}
> +	if (!chip)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> 
>  	if (test_and_set_bit(0, &chip->is_open)) {
>  		dev_dbg(chip->dev, "Another process owns this TPM\n");
> -		rc = -EBUSY;
> -		goto err_out;

but don't you need to put_device(chip->dev)?

> +		return -EBUSY;
>  	}
> 
> -	get_device(chip->dev);
> -
> -	spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
> -
>  	chip->data_buffer = kmalloc(TPM_BUFSIZE * sizeof(u8), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (chip->data_buffer == NULL) {
>  		clear_bit(0, &chip->is_open);
> @@ -999,26 +993,23 @@ int tpm_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> 
>  	file->private_data = chip;
>  	return 0;
> -
> -err_out:
> -	spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
> -	return rc;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_open);
> 
> +/*
> + * Called on file close
> + */
>  int tpm_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  {
>  	struct tpm_chip *chip = file->private_data;
> 
>  	flush_scheduled_work();
> -	spin_lock(&driver_lock);
>  	file->private_data = NULL;
>  	del_singleshot_timer_sync(&chip->user_read_timer);
>  	atomic_set(&chip->data_pending, 0);
> +	kfree(chip->data_buffer);

And so chip->data_buffer (and data_pending) may *only* be accessed by
the owner of the chip, who has set chip->is_open?

Could you comment that in tpm.h for future reference?  I've been trying
to push for better commenting of precisely how the locking is expected
to work, but I think that was misunderstood as asking for email
explanations, when I really want it commented in the code.

>  	clear_bit(0, &chip->is_open);
>  	put_device(chip->dev);
> -	kfree(chip->data_buffer);
> -	spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_release);
> @@ -1092,13 +1083,11 @@ void tpm_remove_hardware(struct device *dev)
>  	}
> 
>  	spin_lock(&driver_lock);
> -
> -	list_del(&chip->list);
> -
> +	list_del_rcu(&chip->list);
>  	spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
> +	synchronize_rcu();
> 
>  	misc_deregister(&chip->vendor.miscdev);
> -
>  	sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, chip->vendor.attr_group);
>  	tpm_bios_log_teardown(chip->bios_dir);
> 
> @@ -1146,8 +1135,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_pm_resume);
>  /*
>   * Once all references to platform device are down to 0,
>   * release all allocated structures.
> - * In case vendor provided release function,
> - * call it too.
> + * In case vendor provided release function, call it too.
>   */
>  static void tpm_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>  {
> @@ -1155,7 +1143,6 @@ static void tpm_dev_release(struct device *dev)
> 
>  	if (chip->vendor.release)
>  		chip->vendor.release(dev);
> -
>  	chip->release(dev);
> 
>  	clear_bit(chip->dev_num, dev_mask);
> @@ -1170,8 +1157,8 @@ static void tpm_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>   * upon errant exit from this function specific probe function should call
>   * pci_disable_device
>   */
> -struct tpm_chip *tpm_register_hardware(struct device *dev, const struct tpm_vendor_specific
> -				       *entry)
> +struct tpm_chip *tpm_register_hardware(struct device *dev,
> +		const struct tpm_vendor_specific *entry)
>  {
>  #define DEVNAME_SIZE 7
> 
> @@ -1230,12 +1217,6 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_register_hardware(struct device *dev, const struct tpm_vend
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
> 
> -	spin_lock(&driver_lock);
> -
> -	list_add(&chip->list, &tpm_chip_list);
> -
> -	spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
> -
>  	if (sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj, chip->vendor.attr_group)) {
>  		list_del(&chip->list);
>  		misc_deregister(&chip->vendor.miscdev);
> @@ -1245,6 +1226,11 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_register_hardware(struct device *dev, const struct tpm_vend
> 
>  	chip->bios_dir = tpm_bios_log_setup(devname);
> 
> +	/* Make chip available */
> +	spin_lock(&driver_lock);
> +	list_add(&chip->list, &tpm_chip_list);
> +	spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
> +
>  	return chip;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_register_hardware);
> -- 
> 1.5.6.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-25 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-23 17:19 [PATCH 0/4] BKL removed, RCU addition and pnp remove Rajiv Andrade
2008-09-23 17:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] TPM: update char dev BKL pushdown Rajiv Andrade
2008-09-23 20:58   ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-09-24 13:14     ` Rajiv Andrade
2008-09-23 17:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] TPM: num_opens to is_open variable change Rajiv Andrade
2008-09-23 17:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] TPM: rcu locking Rajiv Andrade
2008-09-23 18:19   ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-09-23 20:18     ` Rajiv Andrade
2008-09-23 20:27       ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-09-25 13:36         ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-25 14:33           ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-09-25 14:59             ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-23 20:19     ` [PATCH 3/4][resubmit] " Rajiv Andrade
2008-09-23 21:01       ` Jonathan Corbet
2008-09-23 21:27         ` Mimi Zohar
2008-09-24 13:10       ` Rajiv Andrade
2008-09-25 13:39         ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-09-25 13:29   ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2008-09-23 17:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] TPM: addition of pnp remove Rajiv Andrade
2008-09-23 17:38   ` about kernel_physical_mapping_init Joilnen Leite

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080925132932.GA13414@us.ibm.com \
    --to=serue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jmoriss@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=safford@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.