Re: [PATCH] dumpstack: x86: various small unification steps

[Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com>]

After "dumpstack: x86: various small unification steps", the
assembler gives the following compile error. The error is in
dumpstack_64.c.

{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:720: Error: Incorrect register `%rbx' used with `l' suffix
{standard input}:1340: Error: Incorrect register `%r12' used with `l' suffix

Indeed the suffix in get_bp() was wrong.

Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>

---

On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 11:46:15AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> 
> > great - i've created tip/x86/dumpstack for this and applied your 
> > patches there. (that branch embedds tip/x86/core which already embedds 
> > tip/x86/traps)
> 
> -tip testing found a 64-bit build failure:
> 
> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> {standard input}:720: Error: Incorrect register `%rbx' used with `l' suffix
> {standard input}:1340: Error: Incorrect register `%r12' used with `l' suffix
> 
> reproducer config attached.
> 
> 	Ingo

Hi Ingo,

"dumpstack: x86: various small unification steps" contained
another copy/paste/forgot-to-edit bug. I should have gone
to bed instead of rushing the patch set out.

Greetings,
    Alexander

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
index 13379a9..086cc81 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
 
 #define STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE 4
-#define get_bp(bp) asm("movl %%rbp, %0" : "=r" (bp) :)
+#define get_bp(bp) asm("movq %%rbp, %0" : "=r" (bp) :)
 
 int panic_on_unrecovered_nmi;
 int kstack_depth_to_print = 3 * STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE;