All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hbabu@us.ibm.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, hpa@zytor.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] x86, dumpstack: some more unification
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:07:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081020150731.GA25999@mailshack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081020134211.GA15574@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>

Hi Ingo, Neil,

Doing more unification of dumpstack is/was on my
TODO list, but it got sidetracked with some other
hobby projects.

I did unify oops_begin, oops_end, die and die_nmi,
and it seems to work. It needs more careful testing,
I think, but if someone (Neil?) wants to take a
look and validate the result...

Greetings,
    Alexander

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	vgoyal@redhat.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Subject: [PATCH] x86, dumpstack: some more unification
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:07:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081020150731.GA25999@mailshack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081020134211.GA15574@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>

Hi Ingo, Neil,

Doing more unification of dumpstack is/was on my
TODO list, but it got sidetracked with some other
hobby projects.

I did unify oops_begin, oops_end, die and die_nmi,
and it seems to work. It needs more careful testing,
I think, but if someone (Neil?) wants to take a
look and validate the result...

Greetings,
    Alexander

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-20 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-17 21:00 [PATCH] kexec: fix hang on i386 when panic occurs while console_sem is held Neil Horman
2008-10-17 21:00 ` Neil Horman
2008-10-20 12:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-20 12:13   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-20 13:42   ` Neil Horman
2008-10-20 13:42     ` Neil Horman
2008-10-20 15:07     ` Alexander van Heukelum [this message]
2008-10-20 15:07       ` [PATCH] x86, dumpstack: some more unification Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-20 15:08       ` [PATCH] x86: make oops_begin and oops_end equal Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-20 15:08         ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-20 15:11         ` [PATCH] x86, dumpstack: make die and die_nmi equal Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-20 15:11           ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-21 14:59           ` Neil Horman
2008-10-21 14:59             ` Neil Horman
2008-10-22 10:00             ` [PATCH 0/7] x86, dumpstack: unify oops_begin, oops_end, die_nmi and die Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:00               ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:00               ` [PATCH 1/7] i386, dumpstack: Move crash_kexec before bust_spinlocks(0) in oops_end Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:00                 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:00                 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86, dumpstack: let signr=0 signal no do_exit Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:00                   ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:00                   ` [PATCH 3/7] x86_64, dumpstack: move kexec_crash from __die to oops_end Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:00                     ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:00                     ` [PATCH 4/7] x86, dumpstack: always call oops_exit from oops_end Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:00                       ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:00                       ` [PATCH 5/7] i386, dumpstack: use x86_64's method to account die_nest_count Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:00                         ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:00                         ` [PATCH 6/7] i386, dumpstack: use oops_begin/oops_end in die_nmi Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:00                           ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:00                           ` [PATCH 7/7] i386, dumpstack: unify die() Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:00                             ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 13:37                             ` Neil Horman
2008-10-22 13:37                               ` Neil Horman
2008-10-22 12:36                           ` [PATCH 6/7] i386, dumpstack: use oops_begin/oops_end in die_nmi Neil Horman
2008-10-22 12:36                             ` Neil Horman
2008-10-22 11:18                         ` [PATCH 5/7] i386, dumpstack: use x86_64's method to account die_nest_count Neil Horman
2008-10-22 11:18                           ` Neil Horman
2008-10-22 11:14                       ` [PATCH 4/7] x86, dumpstack: always call oops_exit from oops_end Neil Horman
2008-10-22 11:14                         ` Neil Horman
2008-10-22 11:11                     ` [PATCH 3/7] x86_64, dumpstack: move kexec_crash from __die to oops_end Neil Horman
2008-10-22 11:11                       ` Neil Horman
2008-10-22 11:01                   ` [PATCH 2/7] x86, dumpstack: let signr=0 signal no do_exit Neil Horman
2008-10-22 11:01                     ` Neil Horman
2008-10-22 10:49                 ` [PATCH 1/7] i386, dumpstack: Move crash_kexec before bust_spinlocks(0) in oops_end Neil Horman
2008-10-22 10:49                   ` Neil Horman
2008-10-21 14:45         ` [PATCH] x86: make oops_begin and oops_end equal Neil Horman
2008-10-21 14:45           ` Neil Horman
2008-10-22 10:18           ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:18             ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-22 10:45             ` Neil Horman
2008-10-22 10:45               ` Neil Horman
2008-10-22 12:02               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-22 12:02                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-22 19:19                 ` Neil Horman
2008-10-22 19:19                   ` Neil Horman
2008-10-23  9:22                   ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-23  9:22                     ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-10-20 16:51       ` [PATCH] x86, dumpstack: some more unification Neil Horman
2008-10-20 16:51         ` Neil Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081020150731.GA25999@mailshack.com \
    --to=heukelum@mailshack.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.