All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: hch@infradead.org, npiggin@suse.de,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	pbadari@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch] fs: remove prepare_write/commit_write
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:01:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081021150135.831eab1b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081021214929.GA24243@infradead.org>

On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:49:29 -0400
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 02:45:05PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Obviously, multiple repetition of the reasons why this is a poor idea
> > didn't sink in, so I won't trouble you with another repetition.
> 
> Sorry, but there's absolutely no point of keeping dead code around for
> out of tree code.

yes, there _are_ reasons.  Two of which are:

- we inconvenience the maintainers and the users of that out-of-tree code

- we drive away testers.  People who are dependent upon out-of-tree
  code cannot test kernel.org kernels.  This happens!  People have
  reported it!

>  It just means we keep dead weight around, that we
> can't test and thus won't fix.  It's not actually doing a service to
> anyone.

We mark it EXPORT_UNUSED_SYMBOL() in 2.6.28.
We remove it from 2.6.29.

That solves the above problems and nothing could be simpler to do.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-21 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-24 23:41 [patch] fs: remove prepare_write/commit_write Nick Piggin
2008-09-24 23:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-09-24 23:54   ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-17 17:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-17 18:45   ` Badari Pulavarty
2008-10-21  6:20     ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-21 21:35       ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-21 21:36         ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-21 21:45           ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-21 21:49             ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-21 22:01               ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-10-22  9:24         ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-22  0:43       ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-22 11:57         ` Edward Shishkin
2008-11-22 10:14         ` [patch 1/2] reiser4: adjust to the new aops Edward Shishkin
2008-11-27 10:34           ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-27 14:34             ` Edward Shishkin
2008-11-27 14:48               ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-26 23:33                 ` [patch 2/2] reiser4: adjust to the new aops fixup Edward Shishkin
2008-10-18  1:57   ` [patch] fs: remove prepare_write/commit_write Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081021150135.831eab1b.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.