From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
npiggin@suse.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, pbadari@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch] fs: remove prepare_write/commit_write
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:49:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081021214929.GA24243@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081021144505.ad66aa91.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 02:45:05PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Obviously, multiple repetition of the reasons why this is a poor idea
> didn't sink in, so I won't trouble you with another repetition.
Sorry, but there's absolutely no point of keeping dead code around for
out of tree code. It just means we keep dead weight around, that we
can't test and thus won't fix. It's not actually doing a service to
anyone.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-21 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-24 23:41 [patch] fs: remove prepare_write/commit_write Nick Piggin
2008-09-24 23:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-09-24 23:54 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-17 17:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-17 18:45 ` Badari Pulavarty
2008-10-21 6:20 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-21 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-21 21:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-21 21:45 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-21 21:49 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-10-21 22:01 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-22 9:24 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-22 0:43 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-22 11:57 ` Edward Shishkin
2008-11-22 10:14 ` [patch 1/2] reiser4: adjust to the new aops Edward Shishkin
2008-11-27 10:34 ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-27 14:34 ` Edward Shishkin
2008-11-27 14:48 ` Nick Piggin
2008-12-26 23:33 ` [patch 2/2] reiser4: adjust to the new aops fixup Edward Shishkin
2008-10-18 1:57 ` [patch] fs: remove prepare_write/commit_write Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081021214929.GA24243@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.