* build failure on sparc64 (Re: linux-next: Tree for October 27)
@ 2008-10-27 15:16 ` Alexander Beregalov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Beregalov @ 2008-10-27 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: linux-next, sparclinux
init/built-in.o: In function `start_kernel':
/home/alexb/linux-2.6/init/main.c:648: undefined reference to `locking_selftest'
kernel/built-in.o: In function `init_kprobes':
/home/alexb/linux-2.6/kernel/kprobes.c:1106: undefined reference to
`init_test_probes'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* build failure on sparc64 (Re: linux-next: Tree for October 27)
@ 2008-10-27 15:16 ` Alexander Beregalov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Beregalov @ 2008-10-27 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: linux-next, sparclinux
init/built-in.o: In function `start_kernel':
/home/alexb/linux-2.6/init/main.c:648: undefined reference to `locking_selftest'
kernel/built-in.o: In function `init_kprobes':
/home/alexb/linux-2.6/kernel/kprobes.c:1106: undefined reference to
`init_test_probes'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on sparc64 (Re: linux-next: Tree for October 27)
2008-10-27 15:16 ` Alexander Beregalov
@ 2008-10-27 15:43 ` Alexander Beregalov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Beregalov @ 2008-10-27 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ananth; +Cc: linux-next, sparclinux
2008/10/27 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>:
> init/built-in.o: In function `start_kernel':
> /home/alexb/linux-2.6/init/main.c:648: undefined reference to `locking_selftest'
> kernel/built-in.o: In function `init_kprobes':
> /home/alexb/linux-2.6/kernel/kprobes.c:1106: undefined reference to
> `init_test_probes'
>
Hm, it was strange situation
`make image` runs oldconfig, after that config was the following:
CONFIG_KERNEL_TESTS disabled
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKING_API_SELFTESTS=y
CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST=y
But they both are under "if KERNEL_TESTS" condition in test/Kconfig.
Strange, I can not reproduce it anymore
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on sparc64 (Re: linux-next: Tree for October 27)
@ 2008-10-27 15:43 ` Alexander Beregalov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Beregalov @ 2008-10-27 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ananth; +Cc: linux-next, sparclinux
2008/10/27 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>:
> init/built-in.o: In function `start_kernel':
> /home/alexb/linux-2.6/init/main.c:648: undefined reference to `locking_selftest'
> kernel/built-in.o: In function `init_kprobes':
> /home/alexb/linux-2.6/kernel/kprobes.c:1106: undefined reference to
> `init_test_probes'
>
Hm, it was strange situation
`make image` runs oldconfig, after that config was the following:
CONFIG_KERNEL_TESTS disabled
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKING_API_SELFTESTS=y
CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST=y
But they both are under "if KERNEL_TESTS" condition in test/Kconfig.
Strange, I can not reproduce it anymore
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on sparc64 (Re: linux-next: Tree for October 27)
2008-10-27 15:43 ` Alexander Beregalov
@ 2008-10-28 4:47 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli @ 2008-10-28 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Beregalov; +Cc: linux-next, sparclinux
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:43:24PM +0400, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
> 2008/10/27 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>:
> > init/built-in.o: In function `start_kernel':
> > /home/alexb/linux-2.6/init/main.c:648: undefined reference to `locking_selftest'
> > kernel/built-in.o: In function `init_kprobes':
> > /home/alexb/linux-2.6/kernel/kprobes.c:1106: undefined reference to
> > `init_test_probes'
> >
>
> Hm, it was strange situation
>
> `make image` runs oldconfig, after that config was the following:
> CONFIG_KERNEL_TESTS disabled
> CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKING_API_SELFTESTS=y
> CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST=y
>
> But they both are under "if KERNEL_TESTS" condition in test/Kconfig.
> Strange, I can not reproduce it anymore
No wonder :-) Stephen dropped the tests/ tree pending a decision on its
future.
You should however be able to select and run the tests from under the
'Kernel hacking' menu.
Ananth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on sparc64 (Re: linux-next: Tree for October 27)
@ 2008-10-28 4:47 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli @ 2008-10-28 4:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Beregalov; +Cc: linux-next, sparclinux
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:43:24PM +0400, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
> 2008/10/27 Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>:
> > init/built-in.o: In function `start_kernel':
> > /home/alexb/linux-2.6/init/main.c:648: undefined reference to `locking_selftest'
> > kernel/built-in.o: In function `init_kprobes':
> > /home/alexb/linux-2.6/kernel/kprobes.c:1106: undefined reference to
> > `init_test_probes'
> >
>
> Hm, it was strange situation
>
> `make image` runs oldconfig, after that config was the following:
> CONFIG_KERNEL_TESTS disabled
> CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKING_API_SELFTESTS=y
> CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST=y
>
> But they both are under "if KERNEL_TESTS" condition in test/Kconfig.
> Strange, I can not reproduce it anymore
No wonder :-) Stephen dropped the tests/ tree pending a decision on its
future.
You should however be able to select and run the tests from under the
'Kernel hacking' menu.
Ananth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on sparc64 (Re: linux-next: Tree for October 27)
2008-10-28 4:47 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
@ 2008-10-28 6:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-10-28 6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ananth; +Cc: Alexander Beregalov, linux-next, sparclinux
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 352 bytes --]
Hi Ananth,
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:05:23 +0530 Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> No wonder :-) Stephen dropped the tests/ tree pending a decision on its
> future.
But I reinstated it a couple of days later ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on sparc64 (Re: linux-next: Tree for October 27)
@ 2008-10-28 6:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-10-28 6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ananth; +Cc: Alexander Beregalov, linux-next, sparclinux
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 352 bytes --]
Hi Ananth,
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:05:23 +0530 Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> No wonder :-) Stephen dropped the tests/ tree pending a decision on its
> future.
But I reinstated it a couple of days later ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-28 6:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-27 15:16 build failure on sparc64 (Re: linux-next: Tree for October 27) Alexander Beregalov
2008-10-27 15:16 ` Alexander Beregalov
2008-10-27 15:43 ` Alexander Beregalov
2008-10-27 15:43 ` Alexander Beregalov
2008-10-28 4:35 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-10-28 4:47 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-10-28 6:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-28 6:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.