From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] acpiphp: Identify more removable slots
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:27:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081113202739.GA11107@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
According to section 6.3.6 of the ACPI spec, the presence of an _RMV
method that evaluates to 1 is sufficient to indicate that a slot is
removable without needing an eject method. This patch refactors the
ejectable slot detection code a little in order to flag these slots as
ejectable and register them. Acpihp therefore binds to the expresscard
slot on my HP test machine.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
index 955aae4..a17984a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void handle_hotplug_event_func(acpi_handle handle, u32 type, void *contex
* Ejectable slot should satisfy at least these conditions:
*
* 1. has _ADR method
- * 2. has _EJ0 method
+ * 2. has _EJ0 method or _RMV method
*
* optionally
*
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ static int is_ejectable(acpi_handle handle)
{
acpi_status status;
acpi_handle tmp;
+ int ret = 0;
status = acpi_get_handle(handle, "_ADR", &tmp);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
@@ -94,11 +95,14 @@ static int is_ejectable(acpi_handle handle)
}
status = acpi_get_handle(handle, "_EJ0", &tmp);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- return 0;
- }
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+ ret = 1;
+
+ status = acpi_get_handle(handle, "_RMV", &tmp);
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+ ret = 1;
- return 1;
+ return ret;
}
@@ -182,17 +186,26 @@ register_slot(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
struct acpiphp_func *newfunc;
acpi_handle tmp;
acpi_status status = AE_OK;
- unsigned long long adr, sun;
- int device, function, retval;
+ unsigned long long adr, sun, removable;
+ int device, function, retval, valid = 0;
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_ADR", NULL, &adr);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return AE_OK;
- status = acpi_get_handle(handle, "_EJ0", &tmp);
+ status = acpi_get_handle(handle, "_RMV", &tmp);
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+ acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_RMV", NULL, &removable);
+ if (removable)
+ valid = 1;
+ }
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && !(is_dock_device(handle)))
+ status = acpi_get_handle(handle, "_EJ0", &tmp);
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) || is_dock_device(handle))
+ valid = 1;
+
+ if (!valid)
return AE_OK;
device = (adr >> 16) & 0xffff;
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
next reply other threads:[~2008-11-13 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-13 20:27 Matthew Garrett [this message]
2008-11-13 20:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] acpiphp: Call _LCK method Matthew Garrett
2008-11-13 20:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] acpiphp: Identify more removable slots Matthew Wilcox
2008-11-13 20:51 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081113202739.GA11107@srcf.ucam.org \
--to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.