All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@bigtelecom.ru>,
	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@visp.net.lb>, jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] net: gen_estimator: Fix gen_kill_estimator() lookups
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:04:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081124120404.GA16413@ff.dom.local> (raw)

gen_kill_estimator() linear lists lookups are very slow, and e.g. while
deleting a large number of HTB classes soft lockups were reported. Here
is another try to fix this problem: this time internally, with rbtree,
so similarly to Jamal's hashing idea IIRC. (Looking for next hits could
be still optimized, but it's really fast as it is.)

Reported-by: Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@bigtelecom.ru>
Reported-by: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@visp.net.lb>
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
---

 net/core/gen_estimator.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/gen_estimator.c b/net/core/gen_estimator.c
index 57abe82..80aa160 100644
--- a/net/core/gen_estimator.c
+++ b/net/core/gen_estimator.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 #include <linux/skbuff.h>
 #include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/rbtree.h>
 #include <net/sock.h>
 #include <net/gen_stats.h>
 
@@ -89,6 +90,7 @@ struct gen_estimator
 	u32			avpps;
 	u32			avbps;
 	struct rcu_head		e_rcu;
+	struct rb_node		node;
 };
 
 struct gen_estimator_head
@@ -102,6 +104,9 @@ static struct gen_estimator_head elist[EST_MAX_INTERVAL+1];
 /* Protects against NULL dereference */
 static DEFINE_RWLOCK(est_lock);
 
+/* Protects against soft lockup during large deletion */
+static struct rb_root est_root = RB_ROOT;
+
 static void est_timer(unsigned long arg)
 {
 	int idx = (int)arg;
@@ -139,6 +144,45 @@ skip:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
+static void gen_add_node(struct gen_estimator *est)
+{
+	struct rb_node **p = &est_root.rb_node, *parent = NULL;
+
+	while (*p) {
+		struct gen_estimator *e;
+
+		parent = *p;
+		e = rb_entry(parent, struct gen_estimator, node);
+
+		if (est->bstats > e->bstats)
+			p = &parent->rb_right;
+		else
+			p = &parent->rb_left;
+	}
+	rb_link_node(&est->node, parent, p);
+	rb_insert_color(&est->node, &est_root);
+}
+
+static struct gen_estimator *gen_find_node(struct gnet_stats_basic *bstats,
+					   struct gnet_stats_rate_est *rate_est)
+{
+	struct rb_node *p = est_root.rb_node;
+
+	while (p) {
+		struct gen_estimator *e;
+
+		e = rb_entry(p, struct gen_estimator, node);
+
+		if (bstats > e->bstats)
+			p = p->rb_right;
+		else if (bstats < e->bstats || rate_est != e->rate_est)
+			p = p->rb_left;
+		else
+			return e;
+	}
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 /**
  * gen_new_estimator - create a new rate estimator
  * @bstats: basic statistics
@@ -194,6 +238,8 @@ int gen_new_estimator(struct gnet_stats_basic *bstats,
 		mod_timer(&elist[idx].timer, jiffies + ((HZ/4) << idx));
 
 	list_add_rcu(&est->list, &elist[idx].list);
+	gen_add_node(est);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -209,34 +255,24 @@ static void __gen_kill_estimator(struct rcu_head *head)
  * @bstats: basic statistics
  * @rate_est: rate estimator statistics
  *
- * Removes the rate estimator specified by &bstats and &rate_est
- * and deletes the timer.
+ * Removes the rate estimator specified by &bstats and &rate_est.
  *
  * NOTE: Called under rtnl_mutex
  */
 void gen_kill_estimator(struct gnet_stats_basic *bstats,
-	struct gnet_stats_rate_est *rate_est)
+			struct gnet_stats_rate_est *rate_est)
 {
-	int idx;
-	struct gen_estimator *e, *n;
-
-	for (idx=0; idx <= EST_MAX_INTERVAL; idx++) {
-
-		/* Skip non initialized indexes */
-		if (!elist[idx].timer.function)
-			continue;
+	struct gen_estimator *e;
 
-		list_for_each_entry_safe(e, n, &elist[idx].list, list) {
-			if (e->rate_est != rate_est || e->bstats != bstats)
-				continue;
+	while ((e = gen_find_node(bstats, rate_est))) {
+		rb_erase(&e->node, &est_root);
 
-			write_lock_bh(&est_lock);
-			e->bstats = NULL;
-			write_unlock_bh(&est_lock);
+		write_lock_bh(&est_lock);
+		e->bstats = NULL;
+		write_unlock_bh(&est_lock);
 
-			list_del_rcu(&e->list);
-			call_rcu(&e->e_rcu, __gen_kill_estimator);
-		}
+		list_del_rcu(&e->list);
+		call_rcu(&e->e_rcu, __gen_kill_estimator);
 	}
 }
 

             reply	other threads:[~2008-11-24 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-24 12:04 Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2008-11-24 13:18 ` [PATCH] net: gen_estimator: Fix gen_kill_estimator() lookups jamal
2008-11-24 13:37   ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-11-24 15:00     ` jamal
2008-11-25  7:52       ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-11-24 23:49     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081124120404.GA16413@ff.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=denys@visp.net.lb \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=slavon@bigtelecom.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.