From: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [ath5k-devel] License of changes to ath5k/ath9k
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:28:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081125222814.GG5950@tesla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6c5339f0811251329h1130fd4aladcbfda52f0542eb@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 01:29:55PM -0800, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> <lrodriguez@atheros.com> wrote:
> > We'll keep using the ath5k Changes-licensed-under tag until we get
> > advice from SFLC if we have done enough to ensure this is no longer
> > necessary. For ath9k, if we are not sure if you have read the
> > "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" we may ping you with an e-mail
> > just to be sure.
>
> I don't consider any of my changes significant enough to confer copyright,
> so by my Signed-off-by, I agree that whatever license the file currently
> has is alright by me. Even if the changes were significant, the previous
> holds.
>
> However, if everyone + SFLC prefers that we strictly use
> Changes-licensed-under even if we don't claim copyright, then I'll
> happily add the tag generator script to a git commit hook :)
Sure, BTW I had created such a script a long time ago, the files just
need to be updated (so update them if you download this thingy):
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mcgrof/scripts/ath5k-license.pl.txt
Understood.
Luis
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Cc: Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@Atheros.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>,
"ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org" <ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org>,
"bkuhn@softwarefreedom.org" <bkuhn@softwarefreedom.org>
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] License of changes to ath5k/ath9k
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:28:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081125222814.GG5950@tesla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6c5339f0811251329h1130fd4aladcbfda52f0542eb@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 01:29:55PM -0800, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> <lrodriguez@atheros.com> wrote:
> > We'll keep using the ath5k Changes-licensed-under tag until we get
> > advice from SFLC if we have done enough to ensure this is no longer
> > necessary. For ath9k, if we are not sure if you have read the
> > "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" we may ping you with an e-mail
> > just to be sure.
>
> I don't consider any of my changes significant enough to confer copyright,
> so by my Signed-off-by, I agree that whatever license the file currently
> has is alright by me. Even if the changes were significant, the previous
> holds.
>
> However, if everyone + SFLC prefers that we strictly use
> Changes-licensed-under even if we don't claim copyright, then I'll
> happily add the tag generator script to a git commit hook :)
Sure, BTW I had created such a script a long time ago, the files just
need to be updated (so update them if you download this thingy):
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mcgrof/scripts/ath5k-license.pl.txt
Understood.
Luis
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Cc: Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@atheros.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>,
"ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org" <ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>,
"bkuhn@softwarefreedom.org" <bkuhn@softwarefreedom.org>
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] License of changes to ath5k/ath9k
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:28:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081125222814.GG5950@tesla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6c5339f0811251329h1130fd4aladcbfda52f0542eb@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 01:29:55PM -0800, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> <lrodriguez@atheros.com> wrote:
> > We'll keep using the ath5k Changes-licensed-under tag until we get
> > advice from SFLC if we have done enough to ensure this is no longer
> > necessary. For ath9k, if we are not sure if you have read the
> > "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" we may ping you with an e-mail
> > just to be sure.
>
> I don't consider any of my changes significant enough to confer copyright,
> so by my Signed-off-by, I agree that whatever license the file currently
> has is alright by me. Even if the changes were significant, the previous
> holds.
>
> However, if everyone + SFLC prefers that we strictly use
> Changes-licensed-under even if we don't claim copyright, then I'll
> happily add the tag generator script to a git commit hook :)
Sure, BTW I had created such a script a long time ago, the files just
need to be updated (so update them if you download this thingy):
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mcgrof/scripts/ath5k-license.pl.txt
Understood.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-25 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-25 21:04 [ath9k-devel] License of changes to ath5k/ath9k Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-11-25 21:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-11-25 21:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-11-25 21:29 ` [ath9k-devel] [ath5k-devel] " Bob Copeland
2008-11-25 21:29 ` Bob Copeland
2008-11-25 21:29 ` Bob Copeland
2008-11-25 22:28 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2008-11-25 22:28 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-11-25 22:28 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-11-27 1:53 ` [ath9k-devel] " Bob Copeland
2008-11-27 1:53 ` Bob Copeland
2008-11-27 1:53 ` Bob Copeland
2008-12-02 4:49 ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-12-02 4:49 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-12-02 4:49 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-11-26 14:59 ` Bradley M. Kuhn
2008-11-26 14:59 ` Bradley M. Kuhn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081125222814.GG5950@tesla \
--to=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.