From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: oleg@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, roland@redhat.com
Cc: daniel@hozac.com, xemul@openvz.org, containers@lists.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sukadev@us.ibm.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] pid: Generalize task_active_pid_ns
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:45:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081126034528.GB23238@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081126034242.GA23120@us.ibm.com>
From 7f7caaa9d9014d7230dc0b1e0f75536f0b6ccdbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:12:02 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] pid: Generalize task_active_pid_ns
Currently task_active_pid_ns is not safe to call after a
task becomes a zombie and exit_task_namespaces is called,
as nsproxy becomes NULL. By reading the pid namespace from
the pid of the task we can trivially solve this problem at
the cost of one extra memory read in what should be the
same cacheline as we read the namespace from.
When moving things around I have made task_active_pid_ns
out of line because keeping it in pid_namespace.h would
require adding includes of pid.h and sched.h that I
don't think we want.
This change does make task_active_pid_ns unsafe to call during
copy_process until we attach a pid on the task_struct which
seems to be a reasonable trade off.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
include/linux/pid_namespace.h | 6 +-----
kernel/fork.c | 4 ++--
kernel/pid.c | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
index d82fe82..38d1032 100644
--- a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
+++ b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
@@ -79,11 +79,7 @@ static inline void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *ns)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PID_NS */
-static inline struct pid_namespace *task_active_pid_ns(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- return tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns;
-}
-
+extern struct pid_namespace *task_active_pid_ns(struct task_struct *tsk);
void pidhash_init(void);
void pidmap_init(void);
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index f608356..28be39a 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1111,12 +1111,12 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
if (pid != &init_struct_pid) {
retval = -ENOMEM;
- pid = alloc_pid(task_active_pid_ns(p));
+ pid = alloc_pid(p->nsproxy->pid_ns);
if (!pid)
goto bad_fork_cleanup_io;
if (clone_flags & CLONE_NEWPID) {
- retval = pid_ns_prepare_proc(task_active_pid_ns(p));
+ retval = pid_ns_prepare_proc(p->nsproxy->pid_ns);
if (retval < 0)
goto bad_fork_free_pid;
}
diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
index 064e76a..c5513fe 100644
--- a/kernel/pid.c
+++ b/kernel/pid.c
@@ -474,6 +474,12 @@ pid_t task_session_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_session_nr_ns);
+struct pid_namespace *task_active_pid_ns(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ return ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(task_active_pid_ns);
+
/*
* Used by proc to find the first pid that is greater then or equal to nr.
*
--
1.5.2.5
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: oleg@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, roland@redhat.com
Cc: daniel@hozac.com, xemul@openvz.org, containers@lists.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sukadev@us.ibm.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] pid: Generalize task_active_pid_ns
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:45:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081126034528.GB23238@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081126034242.GA23120@us.ibm.com>
>From 7f7caaa9d9014d7230dc0b1e0f75536f0b6ccdbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:12:02 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] pid: Generalize task_active_pid_ns
Currently task_active_pid_ns is not safe to call after a
task becomes a zombie and exit_task_namespaces is called,
as nsproxy becomes NULL. By reading the pid namespace from
the pid of the task we can trivially solve this problem at
the cost of one extra memory read in what should be the
same cacheline as we read the namespace from.
When moving things around I have made task_active_pid_ns
out of line because keeping it in pid_namespace.h would
require adding includes of pid.h and sched.h that I
don't think we want.
This change does make task_active_pid_ns unsafe to call during
copy_process until we attach a pid on the task_struct which
seems to be a reasonable trade off.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
include/linux/pid_namespace.h | 6 +-----
kernel/fork.c | 4 ++--
kernel/pid.c | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
index d82fe82..38d1032 100644
--- a/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
+++ b/include/linux/pid_namespace.h
@@ -79,11 +79,7 @@ static inline void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *ns)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PID_NS */
-static inline struct pid_namespace *task_active_pid_ns(struct task_struct *tsk)
-{
- return tsk->nsproxy->pid_ns;
-}
-
+extern struct pid_namespace *task_active_pid_ns(struct task_struct *tsk);
void pidhash_init(void);
void pidmap_init(void);
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index f608356..28be39a 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1111,12 +1111,12 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
if (pid != &init_struct_pid) {
retval = -ENOMEM;
- pid = alloc_pid(task_active_pid_ns(p));
+ pid = alloc_pid(p->nsproxy->pid_ns);
if (!pid)
goto bad_fork_cleanup_io;
if (clone_flags & CLONE_NEWPID) {
- retval = pid_ns_prepare_proc(task_active_pid_ns(p));
+ retval = pid_ns_prepare_proc(p->nsproxy->pid_ns);
if (retval < 0)
goto bad_fork_free_pid;
}
diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
index 064e76a..c5513fe 100644
--- a/kernel/pid.c
+++ b/kernel/pid.c
@@ -474,6 +474,12 @@ pid_t task_session_nr_ns(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pid_namespace *ns)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(task_session_nr_ns);
+struct pid_namespace *task_active_pid_ns(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ return ns_of_pid(task_pid(tsk));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(task_active_pid_ns);
+
/*
* Used by proc to find the first pid that is greater then or equal to nr.
*
--
1.5.2.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-26 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-26 3:42 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Container init signal semantics Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-26 3:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] pid: Implement ns_of_pid Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-26 3:44 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-27 1:19 ` Bastian Blank
2008-12-01 20:24 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-02 11:58 ` Bastian Blank
2008-12-02 22:12 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-03 0:34 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-11-26 3:45 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu [this message]
2008-11-26 3:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] pid: Generalize task_active_pid_ns Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-27 1:17 ` Bastian Blank
2008-11-27 21:19 ` Greg Kurz
2008-12-01 21:15 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-02 11:57 ` Bastian Blank
2008-12-03 7:41 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-03 7:41 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-04 12:58 ` Bastian Blank
2008-11-27 13:09 ` Nadia Derbey
2008-12-01 20:38 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-26 3:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] Determine if sender is from ancestor ns Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-26 3:46 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-02 3:07 ` Roland McGrath
[not found] ` <20081126034611.GC23238-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-27 1:01 ` Bastian Blank
2008-11-27 1:01 ` Bastian Blank
2008-12-01 20:15 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-02 11:48 ` Bastian Blank
2008-12-02 19:59 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-04 12:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] Determine if sender is from ancestor ns+ Bastian Blank
2008-12-04 1:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] Determine if sender is from ancestor ns Roland McGrath
2008-12-04 1:06 ` Roland McGrath
2008-12-09 3:22 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-26 3:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] Protect cinit from fatal signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-26 3:46 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-27 1:07 ` Bastian Blank
2008-12-01 20:21 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-02 12:06 ` Bastian Blank
2008-12-02 20:51 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-12-04 12:52 ` Bastian Blank
2008-12-04 18:58 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-26 3:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] Clear si_pid for signal from ancestor ns Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2008-11-26 3:46 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081126034528.GB23238@us.ibm.com \
--to=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=daniel@hozac.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=sukadev@us.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.