Re: [PATCH] vmscan: skip freeing memory from zones with lots free

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:59:21 -0500 Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:41:34 -0500 Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:58:32 -0500 Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> Will this new patch reintroduce the problem which
> >>>>> 26e4931632352e3c95a61edac22d12ebb72038fe fixed?
> >> No, that problem is already taken care of by the fact that
> >> active pages always get deactivated in the current VM,
> >> regardless of whether or not they were referenced.
> > 
> > err, sorry, that was the wrong commit. 
> > 26e4931632352e3c95a61edac22d12ebb72038fe _introduced_ the problem, as
> > predicted in the changelog.
> > 
> > 265b2b8cac1774f5f30c88e0ab8d0bcf794ef7b3 later fixed it up.
> 
> The patch I sent in this thread does not do any baling out,
> it only skips zones where the number of free pages is more
> than 4 times zone->pages_high.

But that will have the same effect as baling out.  Moreso, in fact.

> Equal pressure is still applied to the other zones.
> 
> This should not be a problem since we do not enter direct
> reclaim unless the free pages in every zone in our zonelist
> are below zone->pages_low.
> 
> Zone skipping is only done by tasks that have been in the
> direct reclaim code for a long time.

>From 265b2b8cac1774f5f30c88e0ab8d0bcf794ef7b3:

    We currently have a problem with the balancing of reclaim
    between zones: much more reclaim happens against highmem than
    against lowmem.

This problem will be reintroduced, will it not?