From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, davej@redhat.com, arjan@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] badpage: ratelimit print_bad_pte and bad_page
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:56:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081202165654.b84ffdad.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812010045520.11401@blonde.site>
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 00:46:53 +0000 (GMT)
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> wrote:
> print_bad_pte() and bad_page() might each need ratelimiting - especially
> for their dump_stacks, almost never of interest, yet not quite dispensible.
> Correlating corruption across neighbouring entries can be very helpful,
> so allow a burst of 60 reports before keeping quiet for the remainder
> of that minute (or allow a steady drip of one report per second).
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
> ---
>
> mm/memory.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/page_alloc.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- badpage6/mm/memory.c 2008-11-28 20:40:48.000000000 +0000
> +++ badpage7/mm/memory.c 2008-11-28 20:40:50.000000000 +0000
> @@ -383,6 +383,29 @@ static void print_bad_pte(struct vm_area
> pmd_t *pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> struct address_space *mapping;
> pgoff_t index;
> + static unsigned long resume;
> + static unsigned long nr_shown;
> + static unsigned long nr_unshown;
> +
> + /*
> + * Allow a burst of 60 reports, then keep quiet for that minute;
> + * or allow a steady drip of one report per second.
> + */
> + if (nr_shown == 60) {
> + if (time_before(jiffies, resume)) {
> + nr_unshown++;
> + return;
> + }
> + if (nr_unshown) {
> + printk(KERN_EMERG
> + "Bad page map: %lu messages suppressed\n",
> + nr_unshown);
> + nr_unshown = 0;
> + }
> + nr_shown = 0;
> + }
> + if (nr_shown++ == 0)
> + resume = jiffies + 60 * HZ;
>
> mapping = vma->vm_file ? vma->vm_file->f_mapping : NULL;
> index = linear_page_index(vma, addr);
> --- badpage6/mm/page_alloc.c 2008-11-28 20:40:42.000000000 +0000
> +++ badpage7/mm/page_alloc.c 2008-11-28 20:40:50.000000000 +0000
> @@ -223,6 +223,30 @@ static inline int bad_range(struct zone
>
> static void bad_page(struct page *page)
> {
> + static unsigned long resume;
> + static unsigned long nr_shown;
> + static unsigned long nr_unshown;
> +
> + /*
> + * Allow a burst of 60 reports, then keep quiet for that minute;
> + * or allow a steady drip of one report per second.
> + */
> + if (nr_shown == 60) {
> + if (time_before(jiffies, resume)) {
> + nr_unshown++;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (nr_unshown) {
> + printk(KERN_EMERG
> + "Bad page state: %lu messages suppressed\n",
> + nr_unshown);
> + nr_unshown = 0;
> + }
> + nr_shown = 0;
> + }
> + if (nr_shown++ == 0)
> + resume = jiffies + 60 * HZ;
> +
gee, that's pretty elaborate. There's no way of using the
possibly-enhanced ratelimit.h?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, davej@redhat.com, arjan@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] badpage: ratelimit print_bad_pte and bad_page
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:56:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081202165654.b84ffdad.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812010045520.11401@blonde.site>
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 00:46:53 +0000 (GMT)
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> wrote:
> print_bad_pte() and bad_page() might each need ratelimiting - especially
> for their dump_stacks, almost never of interest, yet not quite dispensible.
> Correlating corruption across neighbouring entries can be very helpful,
> so allow a burst of 60 reports before keeping quiet for the remainder
> of that minute (or allow a steady drip of one report per second).
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
> ---
>
> mm/memory.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/page_alloc.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- badpage6/mm/memory.c 2008-11-28 20:40:48.000000000 +0000
> +++ badpage7/mm/memory.c 2008-11-28 20:40:50.000000000 +0000
> @@ -383,6 +383,29 @@ static void print_bad_pte(struct vm_area
> pmd_t *pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> struct address_space *mapping;
> pgoff_t index;
> + static unsigned long resume;
> + static unsigned long nr_shown;
> + static unsigned long nr_unshown;
> +
> + /*
> + * Allow a burst of 60 reports, then keep quiet for that minute;
> + * or allow a steady drip of one report per second.
> + */
> + if (nr_shown == 60) {
> + if (time_before(jiffies, resume)) {
> + nr_unshown++;
> + return;
> + }
> + if (nr_unshown) {
> + printk(KERN_EMERG
> + "Bad page map: %lu messages suppressed\n",
> + nr_unshown);
> + nr_unshown = 0;
> + }
> + nr_shown = 0;
> + }
> + if (nr_shown++ == 0)
> + resume = jiffies + 60 * HZ;
>
> mapping = vma->vm_file ? vma->vm_file->f_mapping : NULL;
> index = linear_page_index(vma, addr);
> --- badpage6/mm/page_alloc.c 2008-11-28 20:40:42.000000000 +0000
> +++ badpage7/mm/page_alloc.c 2008-11-28 20:40:50.000000000 +0000
> @@ -223,6 +223,30 @@ static inline int bad_range(struct zone
>
> static void bad_page(struct page *page)
> {
> + static unsigned long resume;
> + static unsigned long nr_shown;
> + static unsigned long nr_unshown;
> +
> + /*
> + * Allow a burst of 60 reports, then keep quiet for that minute;
> + * or allow a steady drip of one report per second.
> + */
> + if (nr_shown == 60) {
> + if (time_before(jiffies, resume)) {
> + nr_unshown++;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + if (nr_unshown) {
> + printk(KERN_EMERG
> + "Bad page state: %lu messages suppressed\n",
> + nr_unshown);
> + nr_unshown = 0;
> + }
> + nr_shown = 0;
> + }
> + if (nr_shown++ == 0)
> + resume = jiffies + 60 * HZ;
> +
gee, that's pretty elaborate. There's no way of using the
possibly-enhanced ratelimit.h?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-03 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-01 0:37 [PATCH 0/8] badpage: more resilient bad page pte and rmap Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 0:37 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 0:40 ` [PATCH 1/8] badpage: simplify page_alloc flag check+clear Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 0:40 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 14:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-01 14:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-01 23:50 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 23:50 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-02 2:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-02 2:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-02 10:39 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-02 10:39 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-02 13:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-02 13:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-02 14:12 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-02 14:12 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-03 0:57 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-03 0:57 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-01 0:41 ` [PATCH 2/8] badpage: keep any bad page out of circulation Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 0:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 14:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-01 14:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-01 23:19 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 23:19 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 0:42 ` [PATCH 3/8] badpage: replace page_remove_rmap Eeek and BUG Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 0:42 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 0:43 ` [PATCH 4/8] badpage: vm_normal_page use print_bad_pte Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 0:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 0:44 ` [PATCH 5/8] badpage: zap print_bad_pte on swap and file Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 0:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 0:45 ` [PATCH 6/8] badpage: remove vma from page_remove_rmap Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 0:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 0:46 ` [PATCH 7/8] badpage: ratelimit print_bad_pte and bad_page Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 0:46 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-03 0:56 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-12-03 0:56 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-03 13:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-03 13:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 0:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] badpage: KERN_ALERT BUG instead of KERN_EMERG Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 0:48 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-12-01 14:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-12-01 14:40 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081202165654.b84ffdad.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.