From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS breakage on m68k (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:23:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081204132327.GA12971@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081204125006.GA13411@infradead.org>
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 07:50:06AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Yeah, but Niv fixed it up and the correct version is not in the xfs git
> tree.
Hah, he noticed the bug but the wrong version got checked in anyway.
Here's the fix (for todays xfs tree):
--
[XFS] Fix compile with CONFIG_COMPAT enabled
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Index: xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl.h
===================================================================
--- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl.h 2008-12-04 14:19:32.000000000 +0100
+++ xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl.h 2008-12-04 14:19:38.000000000 +0100
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ xfs_file_compat_ioctl(
unsigned long arg);
extern long
-xfs_file_compat_ioctl_invis(
+xfs_file_compat_invis_ioctl(
struct file *file,
unsigned int cmd,
unsigned long arg);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: XFS breakage on m68k (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3)
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:23:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081204132327.GA12971@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081204125006.GA13411@infradead.org>
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 07:50:06AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Yeah, but Niv fixed it up and the correct version is not in the xfs git
> tree.
Hah, he noticed the bug but the wrong version got checked in anyway.
Here's the fix (for todays xfs tree):
--
[XFS] Fix compile with CONFIG_COMPAT enabled
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Index: xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl.h
===================================================================
--- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl.h 2008-12-04 14:19:32.000000000 +0100
+++ xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl.h 2008-12-04 14:19:38.000000000 +0100
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ xfs_file_compat_ioctl(
unsigned long arg);
extern long
-xfs_file_compat_ioctl_invis(
+xfs_file_compat_invis_ioctl(
struct file *file,
unsigned int cmd,
unsigned long arg);
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-04 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-03 7:36 linux-next: Tree for December 3 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-03 12:41 ` next-20081203 build failure, when building xfs_file.o Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-03 12:41 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-03 12:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-03 12:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-03 14:15 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-03 14:15 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-03 19:49 ` m68k 8390 breakage (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3) Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-12-03 19:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-12-03 20:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-12-04 6:18 ` m68k 8390 breakage David Miller
2008-12-03 21:16 ` linux-next: Tree for December 3 (media/video/cx88) Randy Dunlap
2008-12-06 10:10 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-12-06 10:10 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-12-06 11:28 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-12-06 11:28 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-12-04 1:30 ` [PATCH -next] rtc twl4030: rename ioctl function when RTC_INTF_DEV=n Randy Dunlap
2008-12-09 10:02 ` Alessandro Zummo
2008-12-04 1:33 ` linux-next: Tree for December 3 (MFD) Randy Dunlap
2008-12-07 20:22 ` Samuel Ortiz
2008-12-04 9:02 ` XFS breakage on m68k (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3) Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-12-04 9:02 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-12-04 12:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-04 12:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-04 12:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-04 12:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-04 12:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-04 12:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-12-04 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-12-04 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081204132327.GA12971@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=lachlan@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.