Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c

Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c

[Nick Andrew]

Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c

From: Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>

It should be 'lose', not 'loose'.

Signed-off-by: Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>
---

 arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)


diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c b/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c
index 972b2d2..a1b3da6 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c
@@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ static int vpe_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 
 	/* It's good to be able to run the SP and if it chokes have a look at
 	   the /dev/rt?. But if we reset the pointer to the shared struct we
-	   loose what has happened. So perhaps if garbage is sent to the vpe
+	   lose what has happened. So perhaps if garbage is sent to the vpe
 	   device, use it as a trigger for the reset. Hopefully a nice
 	   executable will be along shortly. */
 	if (ret < 0)

Re: Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c

[Ralf Baechle]

On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:36:54AM +1100, Nick Andrew wrote:
> From: Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>
> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:36:54 +1100
> To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>,
> 	Lucas Woods <woodzy@gmail.com>, Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>,
> 	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c
> 
> Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c
> 
> From: Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>
> 
> It should be 'lose', not 'loose'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>

Thanks, applied.  Note that the address you used for Kevin Kissel to post
your patch is no longer valid.

  Ralf

Re: Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c

[Kevin D. Kissell]

Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:36:54AM +1100, Nick Andrew wrote:
>   
>> From: Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>
>> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:36:54 +1100
>> To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>,
>> 	Lucas Woods <woodzy@gmail.com>, Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>,
>> 	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
>> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
>> Subject: Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c
>>
>> Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c
>>
>> From: Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>
>>
>> It should be 'lose', not 'loose'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>
>>     
>
> Thanks, applied.  Note that the address you used for Kevin Kissel to post
> your patch is no longer valid.
>   
Yeah, but I'm still on the mailing list, so I saw it.  I don't "own" 
that particular module,
but for whatever it's worth, I'm OK with fixing the comment - though I'm 
surprised
that checkpatch let a non-canonical multi-line comment block like that 
go by.  ;o)

          Regards,

          Kevin K.

Re: Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c

[Nick Andrew]

On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 03:56:54PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> Thanks, applied.  Note that the address you used for Kevin Kissel to post
> your patch is no longer valid.

Yep. By default the get_maintainers.pl script which I used trawls through
'git log' to find everybody who was involved in a commit in each affected
file during the last 12 months. Kevin signed off commit b618336aac14 from
his old address.

Nick.
-- 
PGP Key ID = 0x418487E7                      http://www.nick-andrew.net/
PGP Key fingerprint = B3ED 6894 8E49 1770 C24A  67E3 6266 6EB9 4184 87E7