All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de,
	hmh@hmh.eng.br
Subject: Re: [RFC] b43: rework rfkill code
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:04:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812101904.07809.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081210175102.GA14282@srcf.ucam.org>

On Wednesday 10 December 2008 18:51:02 Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 06:37:23PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> 
> > Ok. I think the fundamental flaw here is assuming that there's just a
> > single state. There isn't. The device can be turned off in hardware (in
> > which case sw won't be able do anything about it, but we want to know)
> > or in software (which we want to handle). Pretending that there's just a
> > single state that's either hw-off, sw-off or on is plain wrong. The
> > device can be hw-off and sw-off at the same time, and then if you turn
> > off the hw-off button it won't turn on (however, unless your system
> > integrator totally screwed up, you won't have a hw and a sw button on
> > your system)
> 
> They may not be physical buttons, but we can often control this anyway. 

But we do not _want_ it.
If you can do it, keep it private to the driver. Do not export it to other layers.
If you need to to sw-rfkill through it, do it in the driver and multiplex
the hw-sw-states in the driver.

-- 
Greetings, Michael.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-10 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-10 15:09 [RFC] b43: rework rfkill code Matthew Garrett
2008-12-10 15:29 ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 16:15   ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-12-10 16:51   ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-12-10 17:18     ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 17:23       ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 17:28         ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 21:33           ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-12-10 21:42             ` Michael Buesch
2008-12-10 17:31         ` Michael Buesch
2008-12-10 17:37           ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 17:51             ` Matthew Garrett
2008-12-10 18:04               ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2008-12-10 18:05               ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 18:09                 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-12-10 18:29                 ` Dan Williams
2008-12-10 18:33                   ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-10 18:59                     ` Dan Williams
2008-12-10 20:07                   ` Michael Buesch
2009-03-29 18:19     ` Johannes Berg
2008-12-11  0:32   ` Julian Calaby
2008-12-11  1:27     ` Michael Buesch
2008-12-11 13:28       ` Kalle Valo
2008-12-10 15:48 ` Michael Buesch
2008-12-10 16:12   ` Matthew Garrett
2008-12-11 16:55 ` Larry Finger
2008-12-12  4:28 ` Larry Finger
2008-12-17 15:48   ` John W. Linville

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200812101904.07809.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.