All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>
To: Vorobiev Dmitri <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
	gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:26:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081210212659.GA6132@zarina> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45755.88.114.236.15.1228932236.squirrel@webmail.movial.fi>

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 08:03:56PM +0200, Vorobiev Dmitri wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:26:26 +0100 (CET)
> > Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >>
> >> The return value of the remove function of a driver structure, and thus
> >> of
> >> a platform_driver structure, is ultimately ignored
> >
> > Currently
> 
> Are there really any plans about actually using the return value?

It's often used by the drivers, but currently not handled by
the subsystem. For example, _remove() callback might return -EBUSY
or -EAGAIN, which means that whoever called the _remove() should
try later.

For example see drivers/mfd/asic3.c. The driver registers GPIO
chips, on _remove() it *tries* to unregister these chips, but
it could fail (when provided GPIOs are in use by somebody -- it
might be in-kernel users, or sysfs users).

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>
To: Vorobiev Dmitri <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
	gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:26:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081210212659.GA6132@zarina> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45755.88.114.236.15.1228932236.squirrel@webmail.movial.fi>

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 08:03:56PM +0200, Vorobiev Dmitri wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:26:26 +0100 (CET)
> > Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >>
> >> The return value of the remove function of a driver structure, and thus
> >> of
> >> a platform_driver structure, is ultimately ignored
> >
> > Currently
> 
> Are there really any plans about actually using the return value?

It's often used by the drivers, but currently not handled by
the subsystem. For example, _remove() callback might return -EBUSY
or -EAGAIN, which means that whoever called the _remove() should
try later.

For example see drivers/mfd/asic3.c. The driver registers GPIO
chips, on _remove() it *tries* to unregister these chips, but
it could fail (when provided GPIOs are in use by somebody -- it
might be in-kernel users, or sysfs users).

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-10 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-10 16:26 [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from Julia Lawall
2008-12-10 16:26 ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions Julia Lawall
2008-12-10 16:38 ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from Alan Cox
2008-12-10 16:38   ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions Alan Cox
2008-12-10 18:03   ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from Vorobiev Dmitri
2008-12-10 18:03     ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions Vorobiev Dmitri
2008-12-10 21:26     ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2008-12-10 21:26       ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-10 22:06       ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from Vorobiev Dmitri
2008-12-10 22:06         ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions Vorobiev Dmitri
2008-12-10 22:06         ` Vorobiev Dmitri
2008-12-10 22:48         ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-10 22:48           ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-10 17:28 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-12-10 17:28   ` Mike Frysinger
2008-12-10 22:18   ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from Vorobiev Dmitri
2008-12-10 22:18     ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions Vorobiev Dmitri
2008-12-10 22:37     ` Mike Frysinger
2008-12-10 22:37       ` Mike Frysinger
2008-12-12  5:17       ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from Greg KH
2008-12-12  5:17         ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions Greg KH
2008-12-12 11:00         ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-12-12 11:00           ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-12-17 21:38           ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from Greg KH
2008-12-17 21:38             ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions Greg KH
2008-12-12 21:00         ` Mike Frysinger
2008-12-12 21:00           ` Mike Frysinger
2008-12-17 21:37           ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from Greg KH
2008-12-17 21:37             ` [PATCH 1/28] drivers/base/platform.c: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081210212659.GA6132@zarina \
    --to=cbouatmailru@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=julia@diku.dk \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.