From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: "Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
Cc: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>,
Bruce Stephens <bruce.stephens@isode.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "git gc" doesn't seem to remove loose objects any more
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:56:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081215155610.GA11502@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081215140834.GA3684@atjola.homenet>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:08:34PM +0100, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> To clarify that a bit more: git gc keeps unreachable objects unpacked,
> so that git prune can drop them. And git gc invokes git prune so that
> only unreachable objects older than 2 weeks are dropped.
To be even more explicit, "git gc" will **unpack** objects that have
become unreachable and were currently in packs. As a result, the
amount of disk space used by a git repository can actually go **up**
dramatically after a "git gc" operation, which could be surprising for
someone who is running close to full on their filesystem, deletes a
number of branches from a tracking repository, and then does a "git
gc" may get a very unpleasant surprise.
A really good repository which shows this is linux-next, since it is
constantly getting rewound, and old branches are reserved via a tag
such as next-20081204. If you update the your local copy of the
linux-next repository every day, you will accumulate a large number of
these old branch tags. If you then delete a whole series of them, and
run git-gc, the operation will take quite a while, and the number of
blocks and inodes used will grow significantly. They will disappear
after a "git prune", but when I do this housekeeping operation, I've
often wished for a --yes-I-know-what-I-am-doing-and-it's-unsafe-but-
just-drop-the-unreachable-objects-cause-this-is-just-a-tracking-repository
option to "git gc".
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-15 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-15 12:52 "git gc" doesn't seem to remove loose objects any more Bruce Stephens
2008-12-15 13:38 ` Mikael Magnusson
2008-12-15 14:08 ` Bruce Stephens
2008-12-15 14:08 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-12-15 15:56 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2008-12-15 16:12 ` Mark Brown
2008-12-15 16:59 ` Johan Herland
2008-12-15 16:59 ` Mikael Magnusson
2008-12-15 17:07 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-15 19:38 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-15 17:11 ` Brandon Casey
2008-12-15 17:38 ` [PATCH] objects to be pruned immediately don't have to be loosened Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081215155610.GA11502@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=bruce.stephens@isode.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikachu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.