From: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
Bj?rn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>,
Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>,
Bruce Stephens <bruce.stephens@isode.com>
Subject: Re: "git gc" doesn't seem to remove loose objects any more
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:59:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812151759.44420.johan@herland.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081215161212.GE31145@sirena.org.uk>
On Monday 15 December 2008, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:56:10AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:08:34PM +0100, Bj?rn Steinbrink wrote:
> > > To clarify that a bit more: git gc keeps unreachable objects
> > > unpacked, so that git prune can drop them. And git gc invokes git
> > > prune so that only unreachable objects older than 2 weeks are
> > > dropped.
> >
> > To be even more explicit, "git gc" will **unpack** objects that
> > have become unreachable and were currently in packs. As a result,
> > the amount of disk space used by a git repository can actually go
> > **up** dramatically after a "git gc" operation, which could be
> > surprising for someone who is running close to full on their
> > filesystem, deletes a number of branches from a tracking
> > repository, and then does a "git gc" may get a very unpleasant
> > surprise.
>
> It can also cause things like the "please repack" warning in git gui
> to go off. This is especially unhelpful since they tend to tell you
> to go and do a gc to resolve the problem.
Instead of exploding all unreachable objects into loose objects, does it
make sense to repack them into a separate pack? AFAICS, that would
solve both the disk usage problem and the git-gui-"please repack"
problem. Also, it might make git-prune's job much easier, since
unreachable objects are now located in a single pack only?
Have fun!
...Johan
--
Johan Herland, <johan@herland.net>
www.herland.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-15 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-15 12:52 "git gc" doesn't seem to remove loose objects any more Bruce Stephens
2008-12-15 13:38 ` Mikael Magnusson
2008-12-15 14:08 ` Bruce Stephens
2008-12-15 14:08 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-12-15 15:56 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-15 16:12 ` Mark Brown
2008-12-15 16:59 ` Johan Herland [this message]
2008-12-15 16:59 ` Mikael Magnusson
2008-12-15 17:07 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-12-15 19:38 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-15 17:11 ` Brandon Casey
2008-12-15 17:38 ` [PATCH] objects to be pruned immediately don't have to be loosened Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200812151759.44420.johan@herland.net \
--to=johan@herland.net \
--cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=broonie@sirena.org.uk \
--cc=bruce.stephens@isode.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikachu@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.