From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: yinghai@kernel.org, svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ego@in.ibm.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
davecb@sun.com, tconnors@astro.swin.edu.au, maxk@qualcomm.com,
gregory.haskins@gmail.com, pavel@suse.cz, rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] sched: nominate preferred wakeup cpu
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:54:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081219225453.GI13409@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081219143832.f2e2c4d1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:31:30 +0100
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > > > [ 74.013893] <EOI> <0>Code: 8b 47 08 4a 8b 0c 00 48 85 c9 0f 84 c3 00 00 00 49 8b 47 10 4a 8b 04 00 48 8b 80 a8 00 00 00 48 85 c0 74 13 48 0f af 45 c8 31 d2 <48> f7 75 c0 49 89 c6 48 89 c6 eb 16 48 63 55 d0 48 8b 45 c8 45
> > > > [ 74.013893] RIP [<ffffffff802375d8>] tg_shares_up+0x113/0x1f1
> > > > [ 74.013893] RSP <ffff88025e057d88>
> > > > [ 74.020022] ---[ end trace 2fc4046e394f2312 ]---
> > > > [ 74.020188] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
> > > >
> > > > config: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/config-akpm2.txt
> > > >
> > > > I'll try hacking some div-by-zero avoidance into update_group_shares_cpu().
> > >
> > > hm, weird - Yinghai noticed this crash in -tip and we have that patch
> > > zapped from all -*-next branches already.
> >
> > I guess you applied Ken's patch from email and had it in -mm?
>
> Nope.
>
> > We have a
> > new version of that patch from Ken now based on Yinghai's bugreport - only
> > lightly tested for now.
> >
> > Ingo
> >
> > ----------->
> > >From d71f5a7c8bf9cd7c74159a53e522e363f2eddaf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>
> > Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:11:50 -0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] sched: fix uneven per-cpu task_group share distribution
>
> linux-next has:
>
> commit 6eed5aaacae0ced9a43a923633befd2c695d6620
> Author: Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>
> Date: Mon Dec 15 23:37:50 2008 -0800
>
> sched: fix uneven per-cpu task_group share distribution
>
> so I guess we have a latency problem.
ah, yes. I did this 22 hours ago:
| commit ea52f4ea5666ffed175ec41efac52b560818563d
| Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
| Date: Fri Dec 19 02:09:20 2008 +0100
|
| Revert "sched: fix uneven per-cpu task_group share distribution"
|
| This reverts commit 6eed5aaacae0ced9a43a923633befd2c695d6620.
|
| Causes crashes.
So should be fixed in the next linux-next iteration.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-19 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-18 17:55 [PATCH v7 0/8] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] sched: convert BALANCE_FOR_xx_POWER to inline functions Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] sched: Framework for sched_mc/smt_power_savings=N Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] sched: favour lower logical cpu number for sched_mc balance Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] sched: nominate preferred wakeup cpu Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 18:12 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-19 21:55 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 22:19 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 22:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-19 22:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-19 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 22:54 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-12-20 4:36 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-20 4:44 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-20 7:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-20 10:02 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-20 10:36 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-20 10:56 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-21 8:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] sched: bias task wakeups to preferred semi-idle packages Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 18:11 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] sched: activate active load balancing in new idle cpus Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] sched: add SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE at MC and CPU level for sched_mc>0 Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] sched: idle_balance() does not call load_balance_newidle() Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 18:12 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-18 20:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-18 20:19 ` [PATCH v7 0/8] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n Ingo Molnar
2008-12-18 20:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-19 8:29 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-19 8:24 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-19 13:34 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-29 23:43 ` MinChan Kim
2008-12-30 2:48 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-30 6:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 6:44 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-30 7:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 18:07 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-02 7:26 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-02 22:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 7:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-03 10:16 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-03 11:22 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-04 15:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-04 18:19 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-04 19:52 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-05 3:20 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-05 4:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-05 6:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-05 15:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 9:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 15:07 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-06 17:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 18:45 ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-07 8:59 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-07 11:26 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-07 14:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-07 15:35 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-08 8:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-08 17:46 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-09 6:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 14:54 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-30 17:31 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081219225453.GI13409@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=davecb@sun.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=gregory.haskins@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tconnors@astro.swin.edu.au \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.