All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
	venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
	mingo@elte.hu, dipankar@in.ibm.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ego@in.ibm.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
	davecb@sun.com, tconnors@astro.swin.edu.au, maxk@qualcomm.com,
	gregory.haskins@gmail.com, pavel@suse.cz,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] sched: nominate preferred wakeup cpu
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:26:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081220105652.GD24181@dirshya.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081220103602.GC24181@dirshya.in.ibm.com>

* Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2008-12-20 16:06:02]:

> * Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2008-12-20 15:32:28]:
> 
> > * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> [2008-12-19 20:44:55]:
> > 
> > > On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:06:38 +0530 Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > kernel/sched.c: In function 'schedule':
> > > > > kernel/sched.c:3679: warning: 'active_balance' may be used uninitialized in this function
> > > > > 
> > > > > This warning is correct - the code is buggy.
> > > > 
> > > > Yes this is my code bug.  I did not see the warning in sched.c.  Is
> > > > there any build option that I need to pass in order to get -Wall
> > > > effect?
> > > 
> > > That was just with plain old kbuild: `make allmodconfig;make'.
> > > 
> > > That warning was produced by gcc-4.0.2.  If you're using something more
> > > recent then gcc has regressed.
> > 
> > This is an interesting problem.  I am unable to get that warning in the
> > following GCC versions even with a combination of the following
> > cmdline options: -Wall -Wextra -Wuninitialized
> > 
> > gcc version 4.1.2 20070502
> > gcc version 4.2.3
> > 
> > I will look for older gcc and check this out.
> 
> I am able to get the above warning in 
> gcc version 3.4.6 (Debian 3.4.6-9)
> with default kbuild, no additional params.
> 
> Did not get the warning in 
> gcc version 4.1.3 20080623
> 
> Hence there has been some change in GCC that prevented the
> uninitialized warning.

Related GCC bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179
Claimed to have been fixed in GCC 4.4, but I don't know if we are ready
to test kernel compile with GCC 4.4.

I have tested till gcc version 4.3.2 (Debian 4.3.2-1) and the bug
is not fixed.  I do not get the warning from sched.c.

--Vaidy

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-20 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-18 17:55 [PATCH v7 0/8] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] sched: convert BALANCE_FOR_xx_POWER to inline functions Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] sched: Framework for sched_mc/smt_power_savings=N Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] sched: favour lower logical cpu number for sched_mc balance Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] sched: nominate preferred wakeup cpu Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 18:12   ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-19 21:55   ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 22:19     ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 22:27       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-19 22:31         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-19 22:38           ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 22:54             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-20  4:36     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-20  4:44       ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-20  7:54         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-20 10:02         ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-20 10:36           ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-20 10:56             ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [this message]
2008-12-21  8:46               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] sched: bias task wakeups to preferred semi-idle packages Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 18:11   ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] sched: activate active load balancing in new idle cpus Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] sched: add SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE at MC and CPU level for sched_mc>0 Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] sched: idle_balance() does not call load_balance_newidle() Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 18:12   ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-18 20:17     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-18 20:19 ` [PATCH v7 0/8] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n Ingo Molnar
2008-12-18 20:31   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-19  8:29     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-19  8:24   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-19 13:34   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-29 23:43 ` MinChan Kim
2008-12-30  2:48   ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-30  6:21     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30  6:44       ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-30  7:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 18:07       ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-02  7:26         ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-02 22:16           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03  7:29             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-03 10:16               ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-03 11:22                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-04 15:00                   ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-04 18:19                     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-04 19:52                       ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-05  3:20                         ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-05  4:40                           ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-05  6:36                             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-05 15:19                               ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06  9:31                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 15:07                                   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-06 17:48                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 18:45                                       ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-07  8:59                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-07 11:26                                           ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-07 14:36                                             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-07 15:35                                               ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-08  8:06                                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-08 17:46                                                   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-09  6:00                                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 14:54                             ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-30 17:31     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081220105652.GD24181@dirshya.in.ibm.com \
    --to=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=davecb@sun.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregory.haskins@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tconnors@astro.swin.edu.au \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.