From: Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Kernel Testers List
<kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Vegard Nossum
<vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers
<x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #12156] v2.6.28-rc2: x86_32 relocation regression?
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:14:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081221081406.GB4773@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vy-yJy0f3YP.A.yhB.qaYTJB@chimera>
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12156
> Subject : v2.6.28-rc2: x86_32 relocation regression?
> Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2008-11-24 21:19 (27 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122756158220966&w=4
not really a regression but a long-standing inconvenience/bug of the debug
symbols of relocatable kernels. (ever since relocatable kernels were added
in '06 or so.) Nevertheless we queued up a revert of the defconfig change
for .29, to not expose it in the defconfig:
f269b07: x86: revert CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y defconfig change
so i think it can be taken off the regressions list.
Ingo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #12156] v2.6.28-rc2: x86_32 relocation regression?
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 09:14:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081221081406.GB4773@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vy-yJy0f3YP.A.yhB.qaYTJB@chimera>
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12156
> Subject : v2.6.28-rc2: x86_32 relocation regression?
> Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
> Date : 2008-11-24 21:19 (27 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122756158220966&w=4
not really a regression but a long-standing inconvenience/bug of the debug
symbols of relocatable kernels. (ever since relocatable kernels were added
in '06 or so.) Nevertheless we queued up a revert of the defconfig change
for .29, to not expose it in the defconfig:
f269b07: x86: revert CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y defconfig change
so i think it can be taken off the regressions list.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-21 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-20 21:56 2.6.28-rc9-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 21:56 ` [Bug #11849] default IRQ affinity change in v2.6.27 (breaking several SMP PPC based systems) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-21 8:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-21 8:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12061] snd_hda_intel: power_save: sound cracks on powerdown Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12159] 2.6.28-rc6-git1 -- No sound produced from Intel HDA ALSA driver Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12028] i915 DRM is broken in 2.6.28-rc4 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12156] v2.6.28-rc2: x86_32 relocation regression? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-21 8:14 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-12-21 8:14 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20081221081406.GB4773-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-21 19:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-21 19:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-22 6:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-12-22 6:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12209] oldish top core dumps (in its meminfo() function) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12208] uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12160] networking oops after resume from s2ram (2.6.28-rc6) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12195] "dd" make kernel panic Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-21 13:52 ` James Bottomley
2008-12-21 13:52 ` James Bottomley
[not found] ` <1229867542.3444.0.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-21 19:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-21 19:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12178] Xorg crash at first start Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-23 11:39 ` Cédric Godin
2008-12-23 11:39 ` Cédric Godin
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12210] 2.6.28-rc8 big regression in VM Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12224] journal activity on inactive partition causes inactive harddrive spinup Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12216] Error when drm is loaded Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-21 8:34 ` François Valenduc
[not found] ` <494DFF88.9090807-bmtTS95sd5BUM80lpFwj4w@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-21 19:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-21 19:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <200812212054.49511.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-22 21:26 ` François Valenduc
2008-12-22 21:26 ` François Valenduc
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12252] new oops on resume due to ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12256] [regression: 2.6.28] NFS client with locking fails Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12260] Regression due to commit 2b80848e3818fb1c (p54usb: support LM87 firmwares) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12265] FPU emulation broken in 2.6.28-rc8 ? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12263] Sata soft reset filling log Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` [Bug #12264] i915: switching from kwin in opengl mode to a VT then back to x11, x11 freezes Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-20 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-21 9:07 ` 2.6.28-rc9-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.27 Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <84144f020812210107k4be14431s4fb61f2d31da8621-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-21 19:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-21 19:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <200812212056.02246.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-22 7:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-22 7:08 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-13 16:29 2.6.28-rc8-git1: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-13 16:33 ` [Bug #12156] v2.6.28-rc2: x86_32 relocation regression? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-13 16:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-07 20:27 2.6.28-rc8-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-07 20:32 ` [Bug #12156] v2.6.28-rc2: x86_32 relocation regression? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-07 20:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-03 21:49 2.6.28-rc7-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-03 21:58 ` [Bug #12156] v2.6.28-rc2: x86_32 relocation regression? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-03 21:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081221081406.GB4773@elte.hu \
--to=mingo-x9un+bfzkdi@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.