All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
To: Sandeep K Sinha <sandeepksinha@gmail.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Device mapper support for more than one target ?
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:50:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081222185033.GA17119@agk.fab.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37d33d830812220922l5a0bc36et5dd1f9853f9cd33@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:52:08PM +0530, Sandeep K Sinha wrote:
> After looking at the complete implementation of device mappers, I
> figured out that we can have more than one target for a mapped device
> then why do we have a check for the number of target to be equal to
> one , in dm_blk_ioctl ( ) in drivers/md/dm.c
> 
> http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.27.10/drivers/md/dm.c#L337

Because whether or not it makes sense to send any specific ioctl to more
than one target in parallel depends on what that ioctl does.  When we
added that code we said that we could add hard-coding for specific
ioctls if the need arose, but so far it hasn't.

Alasdair
-- 
agk@redhat.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
To: Sandeep K Sinha <sandeepksinha@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Device mapper support for more than one target ?
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:50:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081222185033.GA17119@agk.fab.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37d33d830812220922l5a0bc36et5dd1f9853f9cd33@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:52:08PM +0530, Sandeep K Sinha wrote:
> After looking at the complete implementation of device mappers, I
> figured out that we can have more than one target for a mapped device
> then why do we have a check for the number of target to be equal to
> one , in dm_blk_ioctl ( ) in drivers/md/dm.c
> 
> http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.27.10/drivers/md/dm.c#L337

Because whether or not it makes sense to send any specific ioctl to more
than one target in parallel depends on what that ioctl does.  When we
added that code we said that we could add hard-coding for specific
ioctls if the need arose, but so far it hasn't.

Alasdair
-- 
agk@redhat.com

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-22 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-22 17:22 Device mapper support for more than one target ? Sandeep K Sinha
2008-12-22 18:50 ` Alasdair G Kergon [this message]
2008-12-22 18:50   ` Alasdair G Kergon
2008-12-22 18:54   ` Sandeep K Sinha
2008-12-22 19:03     ` Sandeep K Sinha
2008-12-22 21:24     ` Alasdair G Kergon
2008-12-22 21:24       ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081222185033.GA17119@agk.fab.redhat.com \
    --to=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeepksinha@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.