From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
To: Piter PUNK <piterpunk@unitednerds.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rt2500usb vs rt73usb
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:34:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812281034.07373.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49571E29.8060204@unitednerds.org>
On Sunday 28 December 2008, Piter PUNK wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have three rt2573 wireless devices:
>
> . TP-Link WN321G
> . D-Link DWA-110
> . Built-in inside Intel ClassmatePC
>
> The D-Link device loads only the rt73usb module and
> works really fine. The other two loads rt73usb AND
> rt2500usb. The correct module for all is rt73usb.
>
> Loading rt2500usb AND rt73usb don't have any functional
> problem. All wireless devices works fine. But is very
> annoying the additional modules loaded.
>
> Both modules are loaded because both handle 148f:2573
> devices. Of course my universe is very small, only two
> devices, but... devices 148f:2573 that works with
> rt2500usb exists? Those devices can work with rt73usb?
rt2500usb and rt73usb drivers are for different chipsets,
so when rt73usb works for a particular chip the rt2500usb
driver will not work for that same chip.
> If the those 148f:2573 USB devices doesn't exists or
> if they exists and works fine with rt73usb, can we
> remove 148f:2573 from rt2500usb?
No we can't, you can blame manufacturers for shipping
USB sticks with different chipsets but the exact same USB ID.
Ivo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-28 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-28 6:35 rt2500usb vs rt73usb Piter PUNK
2008-12-28 9:34 ` Ivo van Doorn [this message]
2008-12-28 22:14 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-12-28 22:32 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-12-28 22:44 ` Luis Correia
2009-01-06 20:27 ` John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200812281034.07373.IvDoorn@gmail.com \
--to=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piterpunk@unitednerds.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.