From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Cc: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>,
Piter PUNK <piterpunk@unitednerds.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rt2500usb vs rt73usb
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:27:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090106202740.GE3544@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1230502494.25726.26.camel@dv>
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 05:14:54PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 10:34 +0100, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > On Sunday 28 December 2008, Piter PUNK wrote:
>
> > > If the those 148f:2573 USB devices doesn't exists or
> > > if they exists and works fine with rt73usb, can we
> > > remove 148f:2573 from rt2500usb?
> >
> > No we can't, you can blame manufacturers for shipping
> > USB sticks with different chipsets but the exact same USB ID.
>
> Maybe there are some hints on the USB level that would make it possible
> to distinguish between the devices without loading the driver?
> Something like the number of endpoints? Then we could ask USB
> developers to provide a way to specify them in the USB devece table.
Seems like a trouble to solve a non-problem...
> > On Sunday 28 December 2008, Piter PUNK wrote:
> > > Loading rt2500usb AND rt73usb don't have any functional
> > > problem. All wireless devices works fine. But is very
> > > annoying the additional modules loaded.
I'm not sure I see how it is annoying, but I'm sorry it annoys you.
Nevertheless, I don't think it is worth much effort to fix it.
John
--
John W. Linville Linux should be at the core
linville@tuxdriver.com of your literate lifestyle.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-06 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-28 6:35 rt2500usb vs rt73usb Piter PUNK
2008-12-28 9:34 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-12-28 22:14 ` Pavel Roskin
2008-12-28 22:32 ` Ivo van Doorn
2008-12-28 22:44 ` Luis Correia
2009-01-06 20:27 ` John W. Linville [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090106202740.GE3544@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piterpunk@unitednerds.org \
--cc=proski@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.