From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
emil.s.tantilov@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com,
alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, dada1@cosmosbay.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] locking, percpu counters: introduce separate lock classes
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:04:38 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081229.230438.90548187.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081230065650.GD30975@elte.hu>
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:56:50 +0100
>
> * David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:05:36 +0100
> >
> > > One small nit: could you please add the Reported-by line for Jeff Kirscher
> > > who reported the problem originally:
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
> >
> > I'll make sure to add that to the commit message after
> > you successfully test Herbert's patch.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> early indications are good: after about 15 random bootup tests the lockdep
> warning has not triggered. (it would trigger on every 2nd kernel before
> that - there's a 66% chance for lockdep to be enabled in my randconfig
> tests)
Sounds good. I'll toss this into my net-2.6 tree, with Jeff's
reported-by and your Tested-by, and send this off to Linus
tonight.
Thanks everyone.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-30 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-25 10:25 unsafe locks seen with netperf on net-2.6.29 tree Jeff Kirsher
2008-12-25 11:26 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-26 14:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-27 19:38 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2008-12-27 20:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-28 0:54 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2008-12-29 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-29 10:07 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-29 10:22 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 10:31 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 10:37 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 11:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 11:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 11:49 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 11:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 12:01 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 12:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 12:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 12:44 ` [patch] locking, percpu counters: introduce separate lock classes Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 14:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 3:58 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-30 6:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 6:39 ` David Miller
2008-12-30 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 7:04 ` David Miller [this message]
2008-12-30 7:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 12:49 ` unsafe locks seen with netperf on net-2.6.29 tree Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 12:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081229.230438.90548187.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.