From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
"Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Subject: Re: unsafe locks seen with netperf on net-2.6.29 tree
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:38:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081229123819.GA18321@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081229121626.GF9628@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:58:27PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > no, i only applied one of them. Is his second patch a good solution in
> > > your opinion, and should i thus test both of them? (or will the second one
> > > iterate some more - in which case i will keep the revert for now)
> >
> > Well the second patch is definitely the right solution to the problem
> > as reported. It just needs to be extended to fix other similar bugs
> > introduced by the original changeset.
>
> okay - will keep the revert for now and will wait for you guys to do the
> full fix.
hm, even with the revert i got the splat below. So some other commits are
causing this too?
Ingo
=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
2.6.28-tip-03883-gf855e6c-dirty #13150
---------------------------------
inconsistent {softirq-on-W} -> {in-softirq-W} usage.
kjournald/1435 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
(&fbc->lock){-+..}, at: [<c034fc75>] __percpu_counter_add+0x65/0xb0
{softirq-on-W} state was registered at:
[<c015da56>] __lock_acquire+0x4c6/0xae0
[<c015e0f9>] lock_acquire+0x89/0xc0
[<c07247a8>] _spin_lock+0x38/0x50
[<c034fc75>] __percpu_counter_add+0x65/0xb0
[<c01b704a>] get_empty_filp+0x6a/0x1d0
[<c01c10a9>] path_lookup_open+0x29/0x90
[<c01c134e>] do_filp_open+0x9e/0x790
[<c01b3e60>] do_sys_open+0x50/0xe0
[<c01b3f5e>] sys_open+0x2e/0x40
[<c0103e76>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
irq event stamp: 125790
hardirqs last enabled at (125790): [<c0191c56>] free_hot_cold_page+0x1b6/0x280
hardirqs last disabled at (125789): [<c0191bae>] free_hot_cold_page+0x10e/0x280
softirqs last enabled at (123900): [<c013ca12>] __do_softirq+0x132/0x180
softirqs last disabled at (125765): [<c010621a>] call_on_stack+0x1a/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
4 locks held by kjournald/1435:
#0: (rcu_read_lock){..--}, at: [<c05bef70>] net_rx_action+0xd0/0x220
#1: (rcu_read_lock){..--}, at: [<c05bbfb1>] netif_receive_skb+0x101/0x3a0
#2: (rcu_read_lock){..--}, at: [<c05f1bf5>] ip_local_deliver+0x55/0x1d0
#3: (slock-AF_INET/1){-+..}, at: [<c060ec3a>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x55a/0x6e0
stack backtrace:
Pid: 1435, comm: kjournald Not tainted 2.6.28-tip-03883-gf855e6c-dirty #13150
Call Trace:
[<c015a0d6>] print_usage_bug+0x176/0x1d0
[<c015b800>] mark_lock+0xbd0/0xd80
[<c015da13>] __lock_acquire+0x483/0xae0
[<c015bcdb>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10
[<c015e0f9>] lock_acquire+0x89/0xc0
[<c034fc75>] ? __percpu_counter_add+0x65/0xb0
[<c07247a8>] _spin_lock+0x38/0x50
[<c034fc75>] ? __percpu_counter_add+0x65/0xb0
[<c034fc75>] __percpu_counter_add+0x65/0xb0
[<c060dc49>] tcp_v4_destroy_sock+0x1d9/0x240
[<c05fa06a>] inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x4a/0x140
[<c05fa675>] ? inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers+0x45/0x50
[<c05fb96d>] tcp_done+0x4d/0x70
[<c060655c>] tcp_rcv_state_process+0x68c/0x950
[<c060c9b6>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xd6/0x310
[<c072475d>] ? _spin_lock_nested+0x3d/0x50
[<c060ecc4>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x5e4/0x6e0
[<c05f1bf5>] ? ip_local_deliver+0x55/0x1d0
[<c05f1c44>] ip_local_deliver+0xa4/0x1d0
[<c05f1bf5>] ? ip_local_deliver+0x55/0x1d0
[<c05f201a>] ip_rcv+0x2aa/0x510
[<c05bbfb1>] ? netif_receive_skb+0x101/0x3a0
[<c05f1d70>] ? ip_rcv+0x0/0x510
[<c05bc199>] netif_receive_skb+0x2e9/0x3a0
[<c05bbfb1>] ? netif_receive_skb+0x101/0x3a0
[<c015d8f1>] ? __lock_acquire+0x361/0xae0
[<c05bc541>] napi_gro_receive+0x1c1/0x200
[<c015b9e0>] ? mark_held_locks+0x30/0x80
[<c05bf1bb>] ? process_backlog+0x7b/0xd0
[<c05bf1d2>] process_backlog+0x92/0xd0
[<c05beff4>] net_rx_action+0x154/0x220
[<c05bef70>] ? net_rx_action+0xd0/0x220
[<c013c989>] __do_softirq+0xa9/0x180
[<c013c8e0>] ? __do_softirq+0x0/0x180
<IRQ> [<c013c8cd>] ? irq_exit+0x4d/0x60
[<c01064ca>] ? do_IRQ+0x8a/0xe0
[<c01b086f>] ? check_object+0xef/0x1f0
[<c01044ac>] ? common_interrupt+0x2c/0x34
[<c01b27d2>] ? kmem_cache_free+0xc2/0xf0
[<c0234b65>] ? journal_write_revoke_records+0xa5/0x140
[<c0234b65>] ? journal_write_revoke_records+0xa5/0x140
[<c0234b65>] ? journal_write_revoke_records+0xa5/0x140
[<c023276d>] ? journal_commit_transaction+0x42d/0xe80
[<c015bc6e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x17e/0x1e0
[<c015bcdb>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10
[<c014101e>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x4e/0x60
[<c023608b>] ? kjournald+0xbb/0x1d0
[<c014b8e0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
[<c0235fd0>] ? kjournald+0x0/0x1d0
[<c014b5d7>] ? kthread+0x47/0x80
[<c014b590>] ? kthread+0x0/0x80
[<c010472f>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-29 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-25 10:25 unsafe locks seen with netperf on net-2.6.29 tree Jeff Kirsher
2008-12-25 11:26 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-26 14:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-27 19:38 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2008-12-27 20:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-28 0:54 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2008-12-29 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-29 10:07 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-29 10:22 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 10:31 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 10:37 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 11:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 11:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 11:49 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 11:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 12:01 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 12:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 12:38 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-12-29 12:44 ` [patch] locking, percpu counters: introduce separate lock classes Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 14:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 3:58 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-30 6:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 6:39 ` David Miller
2008-12-30 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 7:04 ` David Miller
2008-12-30 7:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 12:49 ` unsafe locks seen with netperf on net-2.6.29 tree Herbert Xu
2008-12-29 12:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-29 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081229123819.GA18321@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.