From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
Subject: Re: audit_pid with multiple userspace auditd processes
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:41:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901071741.20531.sgrubb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1231364199.31089.61.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 04:36:39 pm Eric Paris wrote:
> lets say userspace starts 2 copies of auditd.
# auditctl -s
AUDIT_STATUS: enabled=1 flag=1 pid=4488 rate_limit=0 backlog_limit=512 lost=1
backlog=0
# /sbin/auditd
# auditctl -s
AUDIT_STATUS: enabled=1 flag=1 pid=0 rate_limit=0 backlog_limit=512 lost=1
backlog=0
# ps -ef | grep auditd
root 580 2 0 08:19 ? 00:00:00 [kauditd]
root 4488 1 0 16:35 ? 00:00:00 auditd
root 5128 3654 0 17:33 pts/1 00:00:00 grep auditd
> Then they kill the first copy. The kernel at that point thinks there is no
> userspace auditd running and will instead send things to dmesg
Looks to me like the kernel is setting auditd_pid to 0 and the second auditd
does not start - at least with my current setup.
For some other setups, it probably overwrites the pid with the new one and
keeps going.
> We could fix it by changing the handling in audit_receive_msg to reject
> setting the audit_pid to 0 if the current audit_nlk_pid !=
> NETLINK_CB(skb).pid.
Well, what if the first crashed and the kernel didn't know it yet? It might be
better to forcibly break the connection to the original auditd.
> It's not a big deal, maybe we just call results of audit with multiple
> userspace auditd's running at the same time a undefined and not care.
What do you get for auditctl -s before and after starting your second auditd?
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-07 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-07 21:36 audit_pid with multiple userspace auditd processes Eric Paris
2009-01-07 22:04 ` Linda Knippers
2009-01-07 22:10 ` Eric Paris
2009-01-07 22:12 ` Linda Knippers
2009-01-07 22:41 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2009-01-07 22:54 ` Eric Paris
2009-01-07 23:07 ` Steve Grubb
2009-01-07 23:11 ` Linda Knippers
2009-01-07 23:24 ` Steve Grubb
2009-01-07 23:33 ` Linda Knippers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901071741.20531.sgrubb@redhat.com \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.