All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: David Brown <lkml@davidb.org>, Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	Phillip Lougher <phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:50:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090110165033.GA23943@logfs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090110124335.GB30744@elte.hu>

On Sat, 10 January 2009 13:43:35 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> What does a performance hit have to do with an ABI? Absolutely nothing - 
> if such a bug is noticed it is fixed, that's it. Your argument does not 
> parse and makes absolutely zero technical sense.
> 
> Your "ABI is forever" objection against a _read only_ filesystem is a 
> newbie mistake worthy of cookie file inclusion - i had a real good laugh 
> when i read it ;-)

Thank you, glad to be of service.  Should I have picked an example where
the code becomes horribly convoluted and there is nothing you can do
about it?

But since I am clearly the newbie, could you try to teach my stupid ass
instead of just ridiculing it?  What is the thing that makes a read only
filesystem special?  And why does everyone believe that I am arguing
against merging squashfs when I'm not?

Jörn

-- 
The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing.
-- John Powell

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: David Brown <lkml@davidb.org>, Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	Phillip Lougher <phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:50:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090110165033.GA23943@logfs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090110124335.GB30744@elte.hu>

On Sat, 10 January 2009 13:43:35 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> What does a performance hit have to do with an ABI? Absolutely nothing - 
> if such a bug is noticed it is fixed, that's it. Your argument does not 
> parse and makes absolutely zero technical sense.
> 
> Your "ABI is forever" objection against a _read only_ filesystem is a 
> newbie mistake worthy of cookie file inclusion - i had a real good laugh 
> when i read it ;-)

Thank you, glad to be of service.  Should I have picked an example where
the code becomes horribly convoluted and there is nothing you can do
about it?

But since I am clearly the newbie, could you try to teach my stupid ass
instead of just ridiculing it?  What is the thing that makes a read only
filesystem special?  And why does everyone believe that I am arguing
against merging squashfs when I'm not?

Jörn

-- 
The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing.
-- John Powell
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-10 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-08 16:48 [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29 Phillip Lougher
2009-01-08 16:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-08 17:05   ` Phillip Lougher
2009-01-08 17:11   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-01-08 17:11     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-01-08 23:55   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-09  1:53   ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-09  2:11     ` Phillip Lougher
2009-01-09  2:24       ` Kay Sievers
2009-01-09  2:36         ` Phil Oester
2009-01-09 16:54           ` Jörn Engel
2009-01-09 16:54             ` Jörn Engel
2009-01-09 19:37             ` David Brown
2009-01-09 19:37               ` David Brown
2009-01-09 21:19               ` Jörn Engel
2009-01-10 12:43                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-10 12:43                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-10 16:50                   ` Jörn Engel [this message]
2009-01-10 16:50                     ` Jörn Engel
2009-01-10 18:12                     ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-10 18:30                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-10 19:57                         ` Jeff Garzik
2009-01-10 20:16                           ` Leon Woestenberg
2009-01-11  6:36                         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-01-10 19:19                       ` Olivier Galibert
2009-01-10 22:15                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-11  9:30                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-01-11 15:39                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-11 16:30                             ` Greg KH
2009-01-22 21:50                               ` Dave Jones
2009-01-22 21:57                                 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-22 21:57                                   ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-22 22:15                                   ` Greg KH
2009-01-22 21:58                                 ` Greg KH
2009-01-22 21:58                                   ` Greg KH
2009-01-22 22:26                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-22 22:50                                   ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-22 23:04                                     ` Greg KH
2009-01-22 23:25                                       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-22 23:34                                       ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-22 23:41                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-22 23:28                                     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-22 22:16                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-22 22:16                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-22 22:24                                   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-23  0:16                                 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-23  0:30                                   ` Greg KH
2009-01-09  2:30     ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-09 11:25     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-09 12:02     ` Alan Cox
2009-01-09 21:56       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-09 22:08         ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-09 22:12           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-09 22:26             ` Alan Cox
2009-01-09 22:36               ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-11  3:01         ` Phillip Lougher
2009-01-11  3:06           ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-09 16:32     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-01-09 16:32       ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090110165033.GA23943@logfs.org \
    --to=joern@logfs.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=kernel@linuxace.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@davidb.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.