From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:48:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090113164842.c6aa7095.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090110003645.GA16107@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
(this is ext3)
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:36:45 -0800
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> wrote:
>
> I started seeing this BUG on one of my test systems during file system unmount
> on the way to shutdown/reboot. The problem is present with latest git and not
> present in 2.6.28.
>
> Hoping that someone has already seen this and fix available before I go
> git bisect way...
>
> Let me know if you need any more detais about the bug or test system.
>
> Thanks,
> Venki
>
>
> [ 212.222623] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
> [ 213.824126] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: R
> X/TX
> [ 213.832083] 0000:06:00.0: eth0: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
> [ 213.842423] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
> [ 579.820973] sb orphan head is 291585
> [ 579.824856] sb_info orphan list:
> [ 579.828373] inode sda3:291585 at ffff880220449c00: mode 100600, nlink 0, ne
> xt 0
> [ 579.836381] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 579.841264] kernel BUG at /home/venkip/src/linus/linux-2.6/fs/ext3/super.c:42
> 8!
> [ 579.849065] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
> [ 579.853602] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1e.0/0000:0b:01.
> 0/irq
> [ 579.861638] CPU 0
> [ 579.863974] Modules linked in:
> [ 579.867387] Pid: 7027, comm: umount Not tainted 2.6.28-05716-gfe0bdec-dirty #
> 587
> [ 579.875244] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff80321151>] [<ffffffff80321151>] ext3_put_sup
> er+0x198/0x1f6
> [ 579.884162] RSP: 0018:ffff88022c9a7e18 EFLAGS: 00010287
> [ 579.889753] RAX: ffff880220449b68 RBX: ffff880229151278 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [ 579.897162] RDX: 0000000000007675 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 000000000000000f
> [ 579.904573] RBP: ffff88022c9a7e48 R08: 0000000000000086 R09: 0000000000000086
> [ 579.911982] R10: ffffffff8024ee4b R11: 0000000000000086 R12: ffff880229150000
> [ 579.919410] R13: ffff88022ae6b000 R14: ffff880229151278 R15: ffff88022cbf8498
> [ 579.926820] FS: 00007fa202bdd6d0(0000) GS:ffffffff80a83080(0000) knlGS:00000
> 00000000000
> [ 579.935408] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> [ 579.941422] CR2: 000000000059d4b8 CR3: 00000002299d7000 CR4: 00000000000406e0
> [ 579.948832] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> [ 579.956244] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> [ 579.963669] Process umount (pid: 7027, threadinfo ffff88022c9a6000, task ffff
> 88022993e180)
> [ 579.972422] Stack:
> [ 579.974695] 0000000000000000 ffffffff80a70c80 ffff88022ae6b000 ffffffff806c2
> 440
> [ 579.982414] 0000000000000008 ffffffff80a70c80 ffff88022c9a7e68 ffffffff802a5
> e6a
> [ 579.990643] ffff88022a9d5040 0000000000000003 ffff88022c9a7e88 ffffffff802a5
> f18
> [ 579.999317] Call Trace:
> [ 580.002027] [<ffffffff802a5e6a>] generic_shutdown_super+0x63/0xf7
> [ 580.008553] [<ffffffff802a5f18>] kill_block_super+0x1a/0x32
> [ 580.014584] [<ffffffff802a5fe5>] deactivate_super+0x4c/0x61
> [ 580.020609] [<ffffffff802b8e4a>] mntput_no_expire+0x10d/0x13d
> [ 580.026814] [<ffffffff802b93ec>] sys_umount+0x2c0/0x2ed
> [ 580.032473] [<ffffffff8020b65b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [ 580.038826] Code: ff ff 48 81 c6 50 04 00 00 89 04 24 31 c0 e8 c8 4f 37 00 48
> 8b 1b 48 8b 03 4c 39 f3 0f 18 08 75 a9 4d 39 b4 24 78 12 00 00 74 04 <0f> 0b eb
> fe 49 8b bd d0 01 00 00 e8 0c 18 fa ff 49 8b bc 24 90
> [ 580.062926] RIP [<ffffffff80321151>] ext3_put_super+0x198/0x1f6
Well that's not good. I don't recall us making any changes which
affect the orphan list handling. Perhaps "filesystem freeze: add error
handling of write_super_lockfs/unlockfs", but only indirectly.
Does Arjan's new async stuff play with filesystems at umount/shutdown
time? Don't think so.
A bisect would be nice, please ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-14 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-10 0:36 kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-14 0:48 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-01-14 1:44 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-14 2:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-14 2:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-14 4:40 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-14 19:16 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-14 19:16 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-14 19:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-14 19:38 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-14 19:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-14 19:48 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-14 21:20 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-21 20:10 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-21 20:10 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-24 7:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-24 7:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-26 16:39 ` Darren Hart
2009-01-26 16:39 ` Darren Hart
2009-01-26 16:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-26 17:12 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090113164842.c6aa7095.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.