From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kerne
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:48:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <496D526D.1010402@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090114014434.GE14730@mit.edu>
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 04:48:42PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> Well that's not good. I don't recall us making any changes which
>> affect the orphan list handling. Perhaps "filesystem freeze: add error
>> handling of write_super_lockfs/unlockfs", but only indirectly.
>>
>> Does Arjan's new async stuff play with filesystems at umount/shutdown
>> time? Don't think so.
>
> Well, Arjan's commit, efaee192: "async: make the final inode deletion
> an asynchronous event", does change how inodes get deleted, and this
> looks like a race where an inode is getting deleted during the umount.
>
> So I would try reverting commit efaee192 and see if it fixes things
> before starting a full bisect...
the commit is already reverted before rc1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:48:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <496D526D.1010402@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090114014434.GE14730@mit.edu>
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 04:48:42PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> Well that's not good. I don't recall us making any changes which
>> affect the orphan list handling. Perhaps "filesystem freeze: add error
>> handling of write_super_lockfs/unlockfs", but only indirectly.
>>
>> Does Arjan's new async stuff play with filesystems at umount/shutdown
>> time? Don't think so.
>
> Well, Arjan's commit, efaee192: "async: make the final inode deletion
> an asynchronous event", does change how inodes get deleted, and this
> looks like a race where an inode is getting deleted during the umount.
>
> So I would try reverting commit efaee192 and see if it fixes things
> before starting a full bisect...
the commit is already reverted before rc1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-14 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-10 0:36 kernel BUG at fs/ext/super.c:428 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-14 0:48 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 1:44 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-14 2:48 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2009-01-14 2:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-14 4:40 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-14 19:16 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-14 19:16 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-14 19:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-14 19:38 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-14 19:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-14 19:48 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-14 21:20 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-21 20:10 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-21 20:10 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-01-24 7:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-24 7:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-26 16:39 ` Darren Hart
2009-01-26 16:39 ` Darren Hart
2009-01-26 16:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-26 17:12 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=496D526D.1010402@linux.intel.com \
--to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.