From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ltt-dev] LTTng 0.74 for Linux 2.6.28 (ext4 tracepoints) (fixed in LTTng 0.78)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:13:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090114001346.GB14730@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090113225827.GA5791@Krystal>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 05:58:27PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >
> > -ECANTBUILD
> >
> Thanks for the report. This should be fixed in LTTng 0.78 now.
Out of curiosity, do you maintain a branch of LTTNG versus any of the
-rc kernels, or do you only track the stable kernels? I tried pulling
LTTNG 0.78 against the most recent Linus mainline and got a whole pile
of conflicts.
I then tried building LTTng 0.78 and got build failures:
CC arch/x86/kernel/init_task.o
distcc[27501] ERROR: compile /var/cache/ccache/init_task.tmp.closure.27497.i on localhost failed
/usr/projects/linux/ext4/arch/x86/kernel/init_task.c:35: error: unknown field ‘user_markers_mutex’ specified in initializer
/usr/projects/linux/ext4/arch/x86/kernel/init_task.c:35: warning: braces around scalar initializer
/usr/projects/linux/ext4/arch/x86/kernel/init_task.c:35: warning: (near initialization for ‘init_task.latency_record_count’)
/usr/projects/linux/ext4/arch/x86/kernel/init_task.c:35: error: field name not in record or union initializer
/usr/projects/linux/ext4/arch/x86/kernel/init_task.c:35: error: (near initialization for ‘init_task.latency_record_count’)
Looks like CONFIG_MARKERS_USERSPAC is busted....
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ltt-dev] LTTng 0.74 for Linux 2.6.28 (ext4 tracepoints) (fixed in LTTng 0.78)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:13:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090114001346.GB14730@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090113225827.GA5791@Krystal>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 05:58:27PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >
> > -ECANTBUILD
> >
> Thanks for the report. This should be fixed in LTTng 0.78 now.
Out of curiosity, do you maintain a branch of LTTNG versus any of the
-rc kernels, or do you only track the stable kernels? I tried pulling
LTTNG 0.78 against the most recent Linus mainline and got a whole pile
of conflicts.
I then tried building LTTng 0.78 and got build failures:
CC arch/x86/kernel/init_task.o
distcc[27501] ERROR: compile /var/cache/ccache/init_task.tmp.closure.27497.i on localhost failed
/usr/projects/linux/ext4/arch/x86/kernel/init_task.c:35: error: unknown field ‘user_markers_mutex’ specified in initializer
/usr/projects/linux/ext4/arch/x86/kernel/init_task.c:35: warning: braces around scalar initializer
/usr/projects/linux/ext4/arch/x86/kernel/init_task.c:35: warning: (near initialization for ‘init_task.latency_record_count’)
/usr/projects/linux/ext4/arch/x86/kernel/init_task.c:35: error: field name not in record or union initializer
/usr/projects/linux/ext4/arch/x86/kernel/init_task.c:35: error: (near initialization for ‘init_task.latency_record_count’)
Looks like CONFIG_MARKERS_USERSPAC is busted....
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-14 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-09 23:54 LTTng 0.73 for Linux 2.6.28 Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-10 16:11 ` [ltt-dev] LTTng 0.74 for Linux 2.6.28 (ext4 tracepoints) Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-13 22:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-13 22:58 ` [ltt-dev] LTTng 0.74 for Linux 2.6.28 (ext4 tracepoints) (fixed in LTTng 0.78) Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-13 23:57 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-14 5:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-14 0:13 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2009-01-14 0:13 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-15 1:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-15 1:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-15 3:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-15 3:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090114001346.GB14730@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.