From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Peter Morreale <pmorreale@novell.com>,
Sven Dietrich <SDietrich@novell.com>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: [GIT PULL] adaptive spinning mutexes
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:33:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090114183319.GA18630@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1231952436.14825.28.camel@laptop>
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> Full series, including changelogs available at:
>
> http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/mutex-adaptive-spin/
>
> and should shortly appear in a git tree near Ingo :-)
Linus,
Please pull the adaptive-mutexes-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git adaptive-mutexes-for-linus
We dropped two fresh patches from v11 for the time being: the two debug
patches, they had test failures [they triggered mutex debugging false
positives].
So this tree is v10 (which got a lot of testing already) plus Chris's
performance patch. It passes all x86 runtime tests here.
The cross build matrix looks good too:
testing 10 architectures.
[ syncing linus ... ]
testing alpha: -git: pass ( 21), -tip: pass ( 21)
testing arm: -git: pass ( 5), -tip: pass ( 5)
testing blackfin: -git: pass ( 20), -tip: pass ( 20)
testing cris: -git: pass ( 32), -tip: pass ( 32)
testing ia64: -git: pass ( 153), -tip: pass ( 153)
testing m32r: -git: pass ( 21), -tip: pass ( 21)
testing m68k: -git: pass ( 34), -tip: pass ( 34)
testing mips: -git: pass ( 4), -tip: pass ( 4)
testing powerpc: -git: pass ( 11), -tip: pass ( 11)
testing sparc: -git: pass ( 0), -tip: pass ( 0)
Passes all and no new warnings.
So in theory this is good enough as a pre-rc2 pull too, should you feel
tempted ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
------------------>
Chris Mason (1):
mutex: adaptive spinnning, performance tweaks
Peter Zijlstra (3):
mutex: small cleanup
mutex: preemption fixes
mutex: implement adaptive spinning
include/linux/mutex.h | 5 +-
include/linux/sched.h | 2 +
kernel/mutex-debug.c | 9 +---
kernel/mutex-debug.h | 18 ++++---
kernel/mutex.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
kernel/mutex.h | 22 ++++++++-
kernel/sched.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
kernel/sched_features.h | 1 +
8 files changed, 209 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h
index 7a0e5c4..3069ec7 100644
--- a/include/linux/mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/mutex.h
@@ -50,8 +50,10 @@ struct mutex {
atomic_t count;
spinlock_t wait_lock;
struct list_head wait_list;
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
+#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES) || defined(CONFIG_SMP)
struct thread_info *owner;
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
const char *name;
void *magic;
#endif
@@ -68,7 +70,6 @@ struct mutex_waiter {
struct list_head list;
struct task_struct *task;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
- struct mutex *lock;
void *magic;
#endif
};
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 4cae9b8..c34b137 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -328,7 +328,9 @@ extern signed long schedule_timeout(signed long timeout);
extern signed long schedule_timeout_interruptible(signed long timeout);
extern signed long schedule_timeout_killable(signed long timeout);
extern signed long schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(signed long timeout);
+asmlinkage void __schedule(void);
asmlinkage void schedule(void);
+extern int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct thread_info *owner);
struct nsproxy;
struct user_namespace;
diff --git a/kernel/mutex-debug.c b/kernel/mutex-debug.c
index 1d94160..50d022e 100644
--- a/kernel/mutex-debug.c
+++ b/kernel/mutex-debug.c
@@ -26,11 +26,6 @@
/*
* Must be called with lock->wait_lock held.
*/
-void debug_mutex_set_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct thread_info *new_owner)
-{
- lock->owner = new_owner;
-}
-
void debug_mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
memset(waiter, MUTEX_DEBUG_INIT, sizeof(*waiter));
@@ -59,7 +54,6 @@ void debug_mutex_add_waiter(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter,
/* Mark the current thread as blocked on the lock: */
ti->task->blocked_on = waiter;
- waiter->lock = lock;
}
void mutex_remove_waiter(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter,
@@ -82,7 +76,7 @@ void debug_mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock)
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock);
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner != current_thread_info());
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!lock->wait_list.prev && !lock->wait_list.next);
- DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->owner != current_thread_info());
+ mutex_clear_owner(lock);
}
void debug_mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const char *name,
@@ -95,7 +89,6 @@ void debug_mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const char *name,
debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)lock, sizeof(*lock));
lockdep_init_map(&lock->dep_map, name, key, 0);
#endif
- lock->owner = NULL;
lock->magic = lock;
}
diff --git a/kernel/mutex-debug.h b/kernel/mutex-debug.h
index babfbdf..6b2d735 100644
--- a/kernel/mutex-debug.h
+++ b/kernel/mutex-debug.h
@@ -13,14 +13,6 @@
/*
* This must be called with lock->wait_lock held.
*/
-extern void
-debug_mutex_set_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct thread_info *new_owner);
-
-static inline void debug_mutex_clear_owner(struct mutex *lock)
-{
- lock->owner = NULL;
-}
-
extern void debug_mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock,
struct mutex_waiter *waiter);
extern void debug_mutex_wake_waiter(struct mutex *lock,
@@ -35,6 +27,16 @@ extern void debug_mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock);
extern void debug_mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const char *name,
struct lock_class_key *key);
+static inline void mutex_set_owner(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+ lock->owner = current_thread_info();
+}
+
+static inline void mutex_clear_owner(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+ lock->owner = NULL;
+}
+
#define spin_lock_mutex(lock, flags) \
do { \
struct mutex *l = container_of(lock, struct mutex, wait_lock); \
diff --git a/kernel/mutex.c b/kernel/mutex.c
index 4f45d4b..5d79781 100644
--- a/kernel/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/mutex.c
@@ -10,6 +10,11 @@
* Many thanks to Arjan van de Ven, Thomas Gleixner, Steven Rostedt and
* David Howells for suggestions and improvements.
*
+ * - Adaptive spinning for mutexes by Peter Zijlstra. (Ported to mainline
+ * from the -rt tree, where it was originally implemented for rtmutexes
+ * by Steven Rostedt, based on work by Gregory Haskins, Peter Morreale
+ * and Sven Dietrich.
+ *
* Also see Documentation/mutex-design.txt.
*/
#include <linux/mutex.h>
@@ -46,6 +51,7 @@ __mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const char *name, struct lock_class_key *key)
atomic_set(&lock->count, 1);
spin_lock_init(&lock->wait_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lock->wait_list);
+ mutex_clear_owner(lock);
debug_mutex_init(lock, name, key);
}
@@ -91,6 +97,7 @@ void inline __sched mutex_lock(struct mutex *lock)
* 'unlocked' into 'locked' state.
*/
__mutex_fastpath_lock(&lock->count, __mutex_lock_slowpath);
+ mutex_set_owner(lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_lock);
@@ -115,6 +122,14 @@ void __sched mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock)
* The unlocking fastpath is the 0->1 transition from 'locked'
* into 'unlocked' state:
*/
+#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
+ /*
+ * When debugging is enabled we must not clear the owner before time,
+ * the slow path will always be taken, and that clears the owner field
+ * after verifying that it was indeed current.
+ */
+ mutex_clear_owner(lock);
+#endif
__mutex_fastpath_unlock(&lock->count, __mutex_unlock_slowpath);
}
@@ -129,21 +144,75 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
{
struct task_struct *task = current;
struct mutex_waiter waiter;
- unsigned int old_val;
unsigned long flags;
+ preempt_disable();
+ mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, ip);
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES)
+ /*
+ * Optimistic spinning.
+ *
+ * We try to spin for acquisition when we find that there are no
+ * pending waiters and the lock owner is currently running on a
+ * (different) CPU.
+ *
+ * The rationale is that if the lock owner is running, it is likely to
+ * release the lock soon.
+ *
+ * Since this needs the lock owner, and this mutex implementation
+ * doesn't track the owner atomically in the lock field, we need to
+ * track it non-atomically.
+ *
+ * We can't do this for DEBUG_MUTEXES because that relies on wait_lock
+ * to serialize everything.
+ */
+
+ for (;;) {
+ struct thread_info *owner;
+
+ /*
+ * If there's an owner, wait for it to either
+ * release the lock or go to sleep.
+ */
+ owner = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->owner);
+ if (owner && !mutex_spin_on_owner(lock, owner))
+ break;
+
+ if (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->count, 1, 0) == 1) {
+ lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, ip);
+ mutex_set_owner(lock);
+ preempt_enable();
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * When there's no owner, we might have preempted between the
+ * owner acquiring the lock and setting the owner field. If
+ * we're an RT task that will live-lock because we won't let
+ * the owner complete.
+ */
+ if (!owner && (need_resched() || rt_task(task)))
+ break;
+
+ /*
+ * The cpu_relax() call is a compiler barrier which forces
+ * everything in this loop to be re-loaded. We don't need
+ * memory barriers as we'll eventually observe the right
+ * values at the cost of a few extra spins.
+ */
+ cpu_relax();
+ }
+#endif
spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
debug_mutex_lock_common(lock, &waiter);
- mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, ip);
debug_mutex_add_waiter(lock, &waiter, task_thread_info(task));
/* add waiting tasks to the end of the waitqueue (FIFO): */
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &lock->wait_list);
waiter.task = task;
- old_val = atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1);
- if (old_val == 1)
+ if (atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1) == 1)
goto done;
lock_contended(&lock->dep_map, ip);
@@ -158,8 +227,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
* that when we release the lock, we properly wake up the
* other waiters:
*/
- old_val = atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1);
- if (old_val == 1)
+ if (atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1) == 1)
break;
/*
@@ -173,21 +241,22 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
spin_unlock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
+ preempt_enable();
return -EINTR;
}
__set_task_state(task, state);
/* didnt get the lock, go to sleep: */
spin_unlock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
- schedule();
+ __schedule();
spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
}
done:
lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, ip);
/* got the lock - rejoice! */
- mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter, task_thread_info(task));
- debug_mutex_set_owner(lock, task_thread_info(task));
+ mutex_remove_waiter(lock, &waiter, current_thread_info());
+ mutex_set_owner(lock);
/* set it to 0 if there are no waiters left: */
if (likely(list_empty(&lock->wait_list)))
@@ -196,6 +265,7 @@ done:
spin_unlock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
debug_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
+ preempt_enable();
return 0;
}
@@ -222,7 +292,8 @@ int __sched
mutex_lock_interruptible_nested(struct mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass)
{
might_sleep();
- return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, subclass, _RET_IP_);
+ return __mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
+ subclass, _RET_IP_);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mutex_lock_interruptible_nested);
@@ -260,8 +331,6 @@ __mutex_unlock_common_slowpath(atomic_t *lock_count, int nested)
wake_up_process(waiter->task);
}
- debug_mutex_clear_owner(lock);
-
spin_unlock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
}
@@ -298,18 +367,30 @@ __mutex_lock_interruptible_slowpath(atomic_t *lock_count);
*/
int __sched mutex_lock_interruptible(struct mutex *lock)
{
+ int ret;
+
might_sleep();
- return __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval
+ ret = __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval
(&lock->count, __mutex_lock_interruptible_slowpath);
+ if (!ret)
+ mutex_set_owner(lock);
+
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_lock_interruptible);
int __sched mutex_lock_killable(struct mutex *lock)
{
+ int ret;
+
might_sleep();
- return __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval
+ ret = __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval
(&lock->count, __mutex_lock_killable_slowpath);
+ if (!ret)
+ mutex_set_owner(lock);
+
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_lock_killable);
@@ -352,9 +433,10 @@ static inline int __mutex_trylock_slowpath(atomic_t *lock_count)
prev = atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1);
if (likely(prev == 1)) {
- debug_mutex_set_owner(lock, current_thread_info());
+ mutex_set_owner(lock);
mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
}
+
/* Set it back to 0 if there are no waiters: */
if (likely(list_empty(&lock->wait_list)))
atomic_set(&lock->count, 0);
@@ -380,8 +462,13 @@ static inline int __mutex_trylock_slowpath(atomic_t *lock_count)
*/
int __sched mutex_trylock(struct mutex *lock)
{
- return __mutex_fastpath_trylock(&lock->count,
- __mutex_trylock_slowpath);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = __mutex_fastpath_trylock(&lock->count, __mutex_trylock_slowpath);
+ if (ret)
+ mutex_set_owner(lock);
+
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mutex_trylock);
diff --git a/kernel/mutex.h b/kernel/mutex.h
index a075daf..67578ca 100644
--- a/kernel/mutex.h
+++ b/kernel/mutex.h
@@ -16,8 +16,26 @@
#define mutex_remove_waiter(lock, waiter, ti) \
__list_del((waiter)->list.prev, (waiter)->list.next)
-#define debug_mutex_set_owner(lock, new_owner) do { } while (0)
-#define debug_mutex_clear_owner(lock) do { } while (0)
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static inline void mutex_set_owner(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+ lock->owner = current_thread_info();
+}
+
+static inline void mutex_clear_owner(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+ lock->owner = NULL;
+}
+#else
+static inline void mutex_set_owner(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void mutex_clear_owner(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
#define debug_mutex_wake_waiter(lock, waiter) do { } while (0)
#define debug_mutex_free_waiter(waiter) do { } while (0)
#define debug_mutex_add_waiter(lock, waiter, ti) do { } while (0)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 8be2c13..589e730 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -4538,15 +4538,13 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
/*
* schedule() is the main scheduler function.
*/
-asmlinkage void __sched schedule(void)
+asmlinkage void __sched __schedule(void)
{
struct task_struct *prev, *next;
unsigned long *switch_count;
struct rq *rq;
int cpu;
-need_resched:
- preempt_disable();
cpu = smp_processor_id();
rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
rcu_qsctr_inc(cpu);
@@ -4603,13 +4601,80 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
if (unlikely(reacquire_kernel_lock(current) < 0))
goto need_resched_nonpreemptible;
+}
+asmlinkage void __sched schedule(void)
+{
+need_resched:
+ preempt_disable();
+ __schedule();
preempt_enable_no_resched();
if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED)))
goto need_resched;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(schedule);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+/*
+ * Look out! "owner" is an entirely speculative pointer
+ * access and not reliable.
+ */
+int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct thread_info *owner)
+{
+ unsigned int cpu;
+ struct rq *rq;
+
+ if (!sched_feat(OWNER_SPIN))
+ return 0;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
+ /*
+ * Need to access the cpu field knowing that
+ * DEBUG_PAGEALLOC could have unmapped it if
+ * the mutex owner just released it and exited.
+ */
+ if (probe_kernel_address(&owner->cpu, cpu))
+ goto out;
+#else
+ cpu = owner->cpu;
+#endif
+
+ /*
+ * Even if the access succeeded (likely case),
+ * the cpu field may no longer be valid.
+ */
+ if (cpu >= nr_cpumask_bits)
+ goto out;
+
+ /*
+ * We need to validate that we can do a
+ * get_cpu() and that we have the percpu area.
+ */
+ if (!cpu_online(cpu))
+ goto out;
+
+ rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+
+ for (;;) {
+ /*
+ * Owner changed, break to re-assess state.
+ */
+ if (lock->owner != owner)
+ break;
+
+ /*
+ * Is that owner really running on that cpu?
+ */
+ if (task_thread_info(rq->curr) != owner || need_resched())
+ return 0;
+
+ cpu_relax();
+ }
+out:
+ return 1;
+}
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
/*
* this is the entry point to schedule() from in-kernel preemption
diff --git a/kernel/sched_features.h b/kernel/sched_features.h
index da5d93b..07bc02e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_features.h
+++ b/kernel/sched_features.h
@@ -13,3 +13,4 @@ SCHED_FEAT(LB_WAKEUP_UPDATE, 1)
SCHED_FEAT(ASYM_EFF_LOAD, 1)
SCHED_FEAT(WAKEUP_OVERLAP, 0)
SCHED_FEAT(LAST_BUDDY, 1)
+SCHED_FEAT(OWNER_SPIN, 1)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-14 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-12 15:37 [PATCH -v8][RFC] mutex: implement adaptive spinning Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-12 16:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-12 16:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-12 16:45 ` Chris Mason
2009-01-12 16:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-12 17:14 ` Chris Mason
2009-01-12 17:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-12 17:30 ` Chris Mason
2009-01-12 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-12 17:33 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-12 18:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-12 16:13 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-12 17:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-12 17:23 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-12 17:32 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-14 16:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-14 17:04 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-14 17:23 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-15 0:50 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-13 15:15 ` [PATCH -v9][RFC] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-13 16:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-13 16:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-13 16:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-13 16:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-13 16:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-13 17:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-13 18:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-13 18:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-13 19:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-14 2:58 ` Chris Mason
2009-01-14 11:18 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-01-14 16:47 ` Chris Mason
2009-01-14 17:32 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-01-14 11:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-14 15:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-14 16:23 ` Chris Mason
2009-01-14 17:06 ` [PATCH -v11 delta] " Ingo Molnar
2009-01-14 17:00 ` [PATCH -v11][RFC] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-14 17:18 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-14 17:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-15 0:46 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-15 7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-15 7:52 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-14 18:33 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-01-14 18:40 ` [GIT PULL] adaptive spinning mutexes Chris Mason
2009-01-15 9:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-14 18:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-14 19:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-15 17:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-01-15 18:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-15 18:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-15 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-15 19:26 ` Chris Mason
2009-01-15 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-15 21:04 ` Chris Mason
2009-01-15 22:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-16 13:32 ` Folkert van Heusden
2009-01-16 13:32 ` Folkert van Heusden
2009-01-16 13:32 ` Folkert van Heusden
2009-01-16 13:57 ` Folkert van Heusden
2009-01-16 13:57 ` Folkert van Heusden
2009-01-16 13:57 ` Folkert van Heusden
2009-01-16 18:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-01-16 18:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-01-16 0:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-16 1:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-16 1:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-16 14:07 ` Folkert van Heusden
2009-01-16 3:03 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-15 18:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-14 18:53 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 19:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-14 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 19:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-14 20:21 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 20:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-14 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 20:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-14 20:30 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 20:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-14 21:06 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 21:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-14 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 23:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-15 0:55 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-14 21:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-14 21:50 ` Kay Sievers
2009-01-14 22:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-15 11:45 ` Folkert van Heusden
2009-01-15 12:53 ` Chris Samuel
2009-01-14 19:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-14 19:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-15 8:41 ` [PATCH] mutex: set owner only once on acquisition Johannes Weiner
2009-01-15 8:56 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-01-13 18:12 ` [PATCH -v9][RFC] mutex: implement adaptive spinning Ingo Molnar
2009-01-13 18:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-13 18:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-14 11:41 ` [PATCH -v8][RFC] " Folkert van Heusden
2009-01-14 11:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-14 11:42 ` Folkert van Heusden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090114183319.GA18630@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=SDietrich@novell.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorreale@novell.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.