All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: mmotm 2009-01-14-20-31 uploaded (gfs2)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:35:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090116093550.ce7229d5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4970BE8F.9090705@oracle.com>

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:06:23 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:

> >>> which is not ideal, but I don't see any easy way to avoid the #ifdef,
> >>>
> >> Take a look in fs.h:
> >>
> >> #define generic_setlease(a, b, c) ({ -EINVAL; })
> >>
> >> If that wasn't a stupid macro, your code would have compiled and ran
> >> just as intended.
> >>
> > There doesn't seem to be an easy answer though. If I #define it to NULL,
> > that upsets other parts of the code that rely on that macro, and if I
> > turn it into a inline function which returns -EINVAL, then presumably I
> > can't take its address for my file_operations.
> 
> No, gcc will allow &inline_func and out-of-line it if it is needed (AFAIK;
> I've seen a few cases of that).
> 

yup.  It measn that we'll get a separate private copy of the
generic_setlease() code in each compilation unit which takes its
address, but I don't think that would kill us.

The prevention is of course to put the stub function in a core kernel
.c file and export it to modules.



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-01-14-20-31 uploaded (gfs2)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:35:50 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090116093550.ce7229d5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4970BE8F.9090705@oracle.com>

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:06:23 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:

> >>> which is not ideal, but I don't see any easy way to avoid the #ifdef,
> >>>
> >> Take a look in fs.h:
> >>
> >> #define generic_setlease(a, b, c) ({ -EINVAL; })
> >>
> >> If that wasn't a stupid macro, your code would have compiled and ran
> >> just as intended.
> >>
> > There doesn't seem to be an easy answer though. If I #define it to NULL,
> > that upsets other parts of the code that rely on that macro, and if I
> > turn it into a inline function which returns -EINVAL, then presumably I
> > can't take its address for my file_operations.
> 
> No, gcc will allow &inline_func and out-of-line it if it is needed (AFAIK;
> I've seen a few cases of that).
> 

yup.  It measn that we'll get a separate private copy of the
generic_setlease() code in each compilation unit which takes its
address, but I don't think that would kill us.

The prevention is of course to put the stub function in a core kernel
.c file and export it to modules.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-16 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-15  4:32 mmotm 2009-01-14-20-31 uploaded akpm
2009-01-15 19:13 ` [Cluster-devel] Re: mmotm 2009-01-14-20-31 uploaded (gfs2) Randy Dunlap
2009-01-15 19:13   ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-16 10:20   ` [Cluster-devel] " Steven Whitehouse
2009-01-16 10:20     ` Steven Whitehouse
2009-01-16 16:43     ` [Cluster-devel] " Andrew Morton
2009-01-16 16:43       ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-16 17:02       ` [Cluster-devel] " Steven Whitehouse
2009-01-16 17:02         ` Steven Whitehouse
2009-01-16 17:06         ` [Cluster-devel] " Randy Dunlap
2009-01-16 17:06           ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-16 17:35           ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-01-16 17:35             ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-16 17:37             ` [Cluster-devel] " Steven Whitehouse
2009-01-16 17:37               ` Steven Whitehouse
2009-01-19 15:16             ` [Cluster-devel] " Steven Whitehouse
2009-01-19 15:16               ` Steven Whitehouse
2009-01-19 17:05               ` [Cluster-devel] " Randy Dunlap
2009-01-19 17:05                 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-19 17:27                 ` [Cluster-devel] " Steven Whitehouse
2009-01-19 17:27                   ` Steven Whitehouse
2009-01-19 17:55                   ` [Cluster-devel] " Randy Dunlap
2009-01-19 17:55                     ` Randy Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090116093550.ce7229d5.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.