From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ben Gamari <bgamari@gmail.com>,
ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: [Regression] High latency when doing large I/O
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:44:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090117004439.GA11492@Krystal> (raw)
Hi,
A long standing I/O regression (since 2.6.18, still there today) has hit
Slashdot recently :
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12309
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/15/049201
I've taken a trace reproducing the wrong behavior on my machine and I
think it's getting us somewhere.
LTTng 0.83, kernel 2.6.28
Machine : Intel Xeon E5405 dual quad-core, 16GB ram
(just created a new block-trace.c LTTng probe which is not released yet.
It basically replaces blktrace)
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
lttctl -C -w /tmp/trace -o channel.mm.bufnum=8 -o channel.block.bufnum=64 trace
dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/newfile bs=1M count=1M
cp -ax music /tmp (copying 1.1GB of mp3)
ls (takes 15 seconds to get the directory listing !)
lttctl -D trace
I looked at the trace (especially at the ls surroundings), and bash is
waiting for a few seconds for I/O in the exec system call (to exec ls).
While this happens, we have dd doing lots and lots of bio_queue. There
is a bio_backmerge after each bio_queue event. This is reasonable,
because dd is writing to a contiguous file.
However, I wonder if this is not the actual problem. We have dd which
has the head request in the elevator request queue. It is progressing
steadily by plugging/unplugging the device periodically and gets its
work done. However, because requests are being dequeued at the same
rate others are being merged, I suspect it stays at the top of the queue
and does not let the other unrelated requests run.
There is a test in the blk-merge.c which makes sure that merged requests
do not get bigger than a certain size. However, if the request is
steadily dequeued, I think this test is not doing anything.
If you are interested in looking at the trace I've taken, I could
provide it.
Does that make sense ?
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next reply other threads:[~2009-01-17 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-17 0:44 Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2009-01-17 16:26 ` [RFC PATCH] block: Fix bio merge induced high I/O latency Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-17 16:50 ` Leon Woestenberg
2009-01-17 17:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-17 19:04 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-18 21:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-18 21:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-19 18:26 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-20 2:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20 7:37 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-20 12:28 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-20 14:22 ` [ltt-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20 14:24 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-20 15:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20 23:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20 23:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-21 0:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-21 4:38 ` Ben Gamari
2009-01-21 4:54 ` [ltt-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-21 6:17 ` Ben Gamari
2009-01-22 22:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-23 3:21 ` [ltt-dev] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-23 4:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-10 3:36 ` [PATCH] mm fix page writeback accounting to fix oom condition under heavy I/O Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-10 3:36 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-10 3:55 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-10 3:55 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-10 5:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-10 5:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-10 5:56 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-10 5:56 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-10 6:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-10 6:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-02 2:08 ` [RFC PATCH] block: Fix bio merge induced high I/O latency Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-02 11:26 ` Jens Axboe
2009-02-03 0:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20 13:45 ` [ltt-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20 20:22 ` Ben Gamari
2009-01-20 22:23 ` Ben Gamari
2009-01-20 23:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-22 2:35 ` Ben Gamari
2009-01-19 15:45 ` Nikanth K
2009-01-19 18:23 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-17 20:03 ` Ben Gamari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090117004439.GA11492@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bgamari@gmail.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.