All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [ltt-dev] [RFC PATCH] block: Fix bio merge induced high I/O latency
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:03:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090123040320.GA23838@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090123220009.34DF.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>

* KOSAKI Motohiro (kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> > So, I ran the tests with my corrected patch, and the results are very
> > good !
> > 
> > "incoming ssh connexion" test
> > 
> > "config 2.6.28 cfq"
> > Linux 2.6.28
> > /sys/block/sd{a,b}/device/queue_depth = 31 (default)
> > /sys/block/sd{a,b}/queue/iosched/slice_async_rq = 2 (default)
> > /sys/block/sd{a,b}/queue/iosched/quantum = 4 (default)
> > 
> > "config 2.6.28.1-patch1"
> > Linux 2.6.28.1
> > Corrected cfq patch applied
> > echo 1 > /sys/block/sd{a,b}/device/queue_depth
> > echo 1 > /sys/block/sd{a,b}/queue/iosched/slice_async_rq
> > echo 1 > /sys/block/sd{a,b}/queue/iosched/quantum
> > 
> > On /dev/sda :
> > 
> > I/O scheduler        runt-min (msec)   runt-max (msec)
> > cfq (2.6.28 cfq)          523             6637
> > cfq (2.6.28.1-patch1)     579             2082
> > 
> > On raid1 :
> > 
> > I/O scheduler        runt-min (msec)   runt-max (msec)
> > cfq (2.6.28 cfq)           523            28216
> > cfq (2.6.28.1-patch1)      517             3086
> 
> Congraturation.
> In university machine room (at least, the university in japan), 
> parallel ssh workload freqently happend.
> 
> I like this patch :)
> 

Please see my today's posts with numbers taken after my Seagate firmware
upgrade.  The runt-max case is pretty hard to trigger "for sure" and I
had to do a few runs to trigger the problem. The latest tests are
better. E.g. the 3086msec is actually just because the problem has not
been hit.

But the 
echo 1 > /sys/block/sd{a,b}/device/queue_depth
echo 1 > /sys/block/sd{a,b}/queue/iosched/slice_async_rq
echo 1 > /sys/block/sd{a,b}/queue/iosched/quantum

Are definitely helping a lot, as my last numbers also show. The patch,
OTOH, degraded performances rather than making them better.

Mathieu

> 
> 
> > 
> > It looks like we are getting somewhere :) Are there any specific
> > queue_depth, slice_async_rq, quantum variations you would like to be
> > tested ?
> > 
> > For reference, I attach my ssh-like job file (again) to this mail.
> > 
> > Mathieu
> > 
> > 
> > [job1]
> > rw=write
> > size=10240m
> > direct=0
> > blocksize=1024k
> > 
> > [global]
> > rw=randread
> > size=2048k
> > filesize=30m
> > direct=0
> > bsrange=4k-44k
> > 
> > [file1]
> > startdelay=0
> > 
> > [file2]
> > startdelay=4
> > 
> > [file3]
> > startdelay=8
> > 
> > [file4]
> > startdelay=12
> > 
> > [file5]
> > startdelay=16
> > 
> > [file6]
> > startdelay=20
> > 
> > [file7]
> > startdelay=24
> > 
> > [file8]
> > startdelay=28
> > 
> > [file9]
> > startdelay=32
> > 
> > [file10]
> > startdelay=36
> > 
> > [file11]
> > startdelay=40
> > 
> > [file12]
> > startdelay=44
> > 
> > [file13]
> > startdelay=48
> > 
> > [file14]
> > startdelay=52
> > 
> > [file15]
> > startdelay=56
> > 
> > [file16]
> > startdelay=60
> > 
> > [file17]
> > startdelay=64
> > 
> > [file18]
> > startdelay=68
> > 
> > [file19]
> > startdelay=72
> > 
> > [file20]
> > startdelay=76
> > 
> > [file21]
> > startdelay=80
> > 
> > [file22]
> > startdelay=84
> > 
> > [file23]
> > startdelay=88
> > 
> > [file24]
> > startdelay=92
> > 
> > [file25]
> > startdelay=96
> > 
> > [file26]
> > startdelay=100
> > 
> > [file27]
> > startdelay=104
> > 
> > [file28]
> > startdelay=108
> > 
> > [file29]
> > startdelay=112
> > 
> > [file30]
> > startdelay=116
> > 
> > [file31]
> > startdelay=120
> > 
> > [file32]
> > startdelay=124
> > 
> > [file33]
> > startdelay=128
> > 
> > [file34]
> > startdelay=132
> > 
> > [file35]
> > startdelay=134
> > 
> > [file36]
> > startdelay=138
> > 
> > [file37]
> > startdelay=142
> > 
> > [file38]
> > startdelay=146
> > 
> > [file39]
> > startdelay=150
> > 
> > [file40]
> > startdelay=200
> > 
> > [file41]
> > startdelay=260
> > 
> > -- 
> > Mathieu Desnoyers
> > OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > ltt-dev mailing list
> > ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> > http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-23  4:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-17  0:44 [Regression] High latency when doing large I/O Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-17 16:26 ` [RFC PATCH] block: Fix bio merge induced high I/O latency Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-17 16:50   ` Leon Woestenberg
2009-01-17 17:15     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-17 19:04   ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-18 21:12     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-18 21:27       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-19 18:26       ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-20  2:10         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20  7:37           ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-20 12:28             ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-20 14:22               ` [ltt-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20 14:24                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-20 15:42                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20 23:06                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20 23:27               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-21  0:25                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-21  4:38                   ` Ben Gamari
2009-01-21  4:54                     ` [ltt-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-21  6:17                       ` Ben Gamari
2009-01-22 22:59                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-23  3:21                 ` [ltt-dev] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-23  4:03                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2009-02-10  3:36                   ` [PATCH] mm fix page writeback accounting to fix oom condition under heavy I/O Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-10  3:36                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-10  3:55                     ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-10  3:55                       ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-10  5:23                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-10  5:23                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-10  5:56                       ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-10  5:56                         ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-10  6:12                       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-10  6:12                         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-02  2:08               ` [RFC PATCH] block: Fix bio merge induced high I/O latency Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-02 11:26                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-02-03  0:46                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20 13:45             ` [ltt-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20 20:22             ` Ben Gamari
2009-01-20 22:23               ` Ben Gamari
2009-01-20 23:05                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-22  2:35               ` Ben Gamari
2009-01-19 15:45     ` Nikanth K
2009-01-19 18:23       ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-17 20:03   ` Ben Gamari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090123040320.GA23838@Krystal \
    --to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.