Re: [Patch] Btrfs: use BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX for struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args

["Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:04:08AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
>On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 21:12 +0800, Am=C3=A9rico Wang wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:03:37AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> >On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:57:32PM +0800, Am=C3=A9rico Wang wrote:
>> >>=20
>> >> I found userspace tool, btrfsctl, uses BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX, and
>> >> it also looks that this one is more proper.
>> >>=20
>> >> Kill BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX since no one will use it.
>> >>=20
>> >
>> >Nope, BTRFS_PATH_NAME_MAX is specifically used for the ioctl stuff,=
 makes the
>> >arguments 4k aligned, this patch is incorrect.  Thanks,
>>=20
>> Ok, then what is BTRFS_VOL_NAME_MAX? :)
>
>Right now it is only used in the progs.  The disk format doesn't reall=
y
>have a max there, it is just to keep names usable.  But, we should add=
 a
>check in the kernel ioctl side, are you interested in sending a patch
>for it?
>

Yup, I will do.

Thanks.

--=20
"Against stupidity, the gods themselves, contend in vain."

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html