All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 03/19] lockdep: sanitize reclaim bit names
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:37:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090122174052.262128471@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090122173701.674448070@chello.nl

[-- Attachment #1: lockdep-generate2.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6753 bytes --]

s/HELD_OVER/ENABLED/g

so that its similar to the hard and soft-irq names.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 include/linux/lockdep.h |    8 ++++----
 kernel/lockdep.c        |   38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/lockdep.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -30,13 +30,13 @@ enum lock_usage_bit
 	LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS,
 	LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ,
 	LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ,
-	LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS,
+	LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS,
 	LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ,
 	LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ,
 	LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS_READ,
 	LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ,
 	LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ,
-	LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS_READ,
+	LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ,
 	LOCK_USAGE_STATES
 };
 
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ enum lock_usage_bit
 #define LOCKF_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS	(1 << LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS)
 #define LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ		(1 << LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ)
 #define LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ		(1 << LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ)
-#define LOCKF_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS	(1 << LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS)
+#define LOCKF_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS	(1 << LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS)
 
 #define LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ (LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ | LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ)
 #define LOCKF_USED_IN_IRQ (LOCKF_USED_IN_HARDIRQ | LOCKF_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ)
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ enum lock_usage_bit
 #define LOCKF_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS_READ	(1 << LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS_READ)
 #define LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ	(1 << LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ)
 #define LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ	(1 << LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ)
-#define LOCKF_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS_READ	(1 << LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS_READ)
+#define LOCKF_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ	(1 << LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ)
 
 #define LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ_READ \
 		(LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ | LOCKF_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -458,8 +458,8 @@ static const char *usage_str[] =
 	[LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ] =	"hardirq-on-R",
 	[LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS] =	"in-reclaim-W",
 	[LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS_READ] = "in-reclaim-R",
-	[LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS] =	"ov-reclaim-W",
-	[LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS_READ] = "ov-reclaim-R",
+	[LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS] =	"ov-reclaim-W",
+	[LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ] = "ov-reclaim-R",
 };
 
 const char * __get_key_name(struct lockdep_subclass_key *key, char *str)
@@ -504,14 +504,14 @@ get_usage_chars(struct lock_class *class
 	if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS)
 		*c5 = '+';
 	else
-		if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS)
+		if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS)
 			*c5 = '-';
 
-	if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS_READ)
+	if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ)
 		*c6 = '-';
 	if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS_READ) {
 		*c6 = '+';
-		if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS_READ)
+		if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ)
 			*c6 = '?';
 	}
 
@@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ check_prev_add_irq(struct task_struct *c
 	 * forwards-subgraph starting at <next>:
 	 */
 	if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS,
-					LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS, "reclaim-fs"))
+					LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS, "reclaim-fs"))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -1345,7 +1345,7 @@ check_prev_add_irq(struct task_struct *c
 	 * forwards-subgraph starting at <next>:
 	 */
 	if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS_READ,
-					LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS, "reclaim-fs-read"))
+					LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS, "reclaim-fs-read"))
 		return 0;
 
 	return 1;
@@ -2058,17 +2058,17 @@ static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_str
 			ret = 2;
 		break;
 	case LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS:
-		if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS))
+		if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS))
 			return 0;
 		if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit,
-				 LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS_READ))
+				 LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ))
 			return 0;
 		/*
 		 * just marked it reclaim-fs-safe, check that this lock
 		 * took no reclaim-fs-unsafe lock in the past:
 		 */
 		if (!check_usage_forwards(curr, this,
-					  LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS, "reclaim-fs"))
+					  LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS, "reclaim-fs"))
 			return 0;
 #if STRICT_READ_CHECKS
 		/*
@@ -2076,7 +2076,7 @@ static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_str
 		 * took no reclaim-fs-unsafe-read lock in the past:
 		 */
 		if (!check_usage_forwards(curr, this,
-				LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS_READ, "reclaim-fs-read"))
+				LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ, "reclaim-fs-read"))
 			return 0;
 #endif
 		if (reclaim_verbose(hlock_class(this)))
@@ -2109,14 +2109,14 @@ static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_str
 			ret = 2;
 		break;
 	case LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS_READ:
-		if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS))
+		if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS))
 			return 0;
 		/*
 		 * just marked it reclaim-fs-read-safe, check that this lock
 		 * took no reclaim-fs-unsafe lock in the past:
 		 */
 		if (!check_usage_forwards(curr, this,
-					  LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS, "reclaim-fs"))
+					  LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS, "reclaim-fs"))
 			return 0;
 		if (reclaim_verbose(hlock_class(this)))
 			ret = 2;
@@ -2173,7 +2173,7 @@ static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_str
 		if (softirq_verbose(hlock_class(this)))
 			ret = 2;
 		break;
-	case LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS:
+	case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS:
 		if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS))
 			return 0;
 		if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit,
@@ -2229,7 +2229,7 @@ static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_str
 		if (softirq_verbose(hlock_class(this)))
 			ret = 2;
 		break;
-	case LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS_READ:
+	case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ:
 		if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS))
 			return 0;
 #if STRICT_READ_CHECKS
@@ -2288,9 +2288,9 @@ mark_held_locks(struct task_struct *curr
 
 		case RECLAIM_FS:
 			if (hlock->read)
-				usage_bit = LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS_READ;
+				usage_bit = LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ;
 			else
-				usage_bit = LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS;
+				usage_bit = LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS;
 			break;
 
 		default:
@@ -2641,8 +2641,8 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct 
 	case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ:
 	case LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS:
 	case LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS_READ:
-	case LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS:
-	case LOCK_HELD_OVER_RECLAIM_FS_READ:
+	case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS:
+	case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ:
 		ret = mark_lock_irq(curr, this, new_bit);
 		if (!ret)
 			return 0;

-- 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-22 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-22 17:37 [RFC PATCH 00/19] lockdep series Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 01/19] lockdep: annotate reclaim context (__GFP_NOFS) Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 19:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 20:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-23  7:33       ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23  8:00         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-23 15:08           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 02/19] lockdep: sanitize bit names Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 04/19] lockdep: lockdep_states.h Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 05/19] lockdep: simplify mark_held_locks Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 06/19] lockdep: simplify mark_lock() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 07/19] lockdep: move state bit definitions around Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 08/19] lockdep: generate the state bit definitions Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 09/19] lockdep: generate usage strings Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 10/19] lockdep: split up mark_lock_irq() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 11/19] lockdep: simplify the mark_lock_irq() helpers Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 12/19] lockdep: further simplify " Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 13/19] simplify mark_lock_irq() helpers #3 Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 14/19] lockdep: merge the _READ mark_lock_irq() helpers Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 15/19] lockdep: merge the !_READ " Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 16/19] lockdep: fully reduce mark_lock_irq() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 17/19] lockdep: simplify get_user_chars() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 18/19] lockdep: get_user_chars() redo Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 19/19] lockdep: simplify check_prev_add_irq() Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090122174052.262128471@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.