All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 13/19] simplify mark_lock_irq() helpers #3
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:37:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090122174053.330242878@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090122173701.674448070@chello.nl

[-- Attachment #1: lockdep-mark_irq3.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5385 bytes --]

Kill another argument

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 kernel/lockdep.c |   64 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -1975,7 +1975,7 @@ void print_irqtrace_events(struct task_s
 	print_ip_sym(curr->softirq_disable_ip);
 }
 
-static int hardirq_verbose(struct lock_class *class)
+static int HARDIRQ_verbose(struct lock_class *class)
 {
 #if HARDIRQ_VERBOSE
 	return class_filter(class);
@@ -1983,7 +1983,7 @@ static int hardirq_verbose(struct lock_c
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int softirq_verbose(struct lock_class *class)
+static int SOFTIRQ_verbose(struct lock_class *class)
 {
 #if SOFTIRQ_VERBOSE
 	return class_filter(class);
@@ -1991,7 +1991,7 @@ static int softirq_verbose(struct lock_c
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int reclaim_verbose(struct lock_class *class)
+static int RECLAIM_FS_verbose(struct lock_class *class)
 {
 #if RECLAIM_VERBOSE
 	return class_filter(class);
@@ -2025,6 +2025,19 @@ static inline const char *state_rname(en
 	return state_rnames[bit >> 2];
 }
 
+static int (*state_verbose_f[])(struct lock_class *class) = {
+#define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \
+	__STATE##_verbose,
+#include "lockdep_states.h"
+#undef LOCKDEP_STATE
+};
+
+static inline int state_verbose(enum lock_usage_bit bit,
+				struct lock_class *class)
+{
+	return state_verbose_f[bit >> 2](class);
+}
+
 static int exclusive_bit(int new_bit)
 {
 	/*
@@ -2046,8 +2058,7 @@ static int exclusive_bit(int new_bit)
 
 static int
 mark_lock_irq_used_in(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
-		      int new_bit,
-		      int (*verbose)(struct lock_class *class))
+		      int new_bit)
 {
 	const char *name = state_name(new_bit);
 	const char *rname = state_rname(new_bit);
@@ -2072,7 +2083,7 @@ mark_lock_irq_used_in(struct task_struct
 	if (!check_usage_forwards(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, rname))
 		return 0;
 #endif
-	if (verbose(hlock_class(this)))
+	if (state_verbose(new_bit, hlock_class(this)))
 		return 2;
 
 	return 1;
@@ -2080,8 +2091,7 @@ mark_lock_irq_used_in(struct task_struct
 
 static int
 mark_lock_irq_used_in_read(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
-			   int new_bit,
-			   int (*verbose)(struct lock_class *class))
+			   int new_bit)
 {
 	const char *name = state_name(new_bit);
 	const char *rname = state_rname(new_bit);
@@ -2096,7 +2106,7 @@ mark_lock_irq_used_in_read(struct task_s
 	 */
 	if (!check_usage_forwards(curr, this, excl_bit, name))
 		return 0;
-	if (verbose(hlock_class(this)))
+	if (state_verbose(new_bit, hlock_class(this)))
 		return 2;
 
 	return 1;
@@ -2104,8 +2114,7 @@ mark_lock_irq_used_in_read(struct task_s
 
 static int
 mark_lock_irq_enabled(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
-		      int new_bit,
-		      int (*verbose)(struct lock_class *class))
+		      int new_bit)
 {
 	const char *name = state_name(new_bit);
 	const char *rname = state_rname(new_bit);
@@ -2131,7 +2140,7 @@ mark_lock_irq_enabled(struct task_struct
 	if (!check_usage_backwards(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, rname))
 		return 0;
 #endif
-	if (verbose(hlock_class(this)))
+	if (state_verbose(new_bit, hlock_class(this)))
 		return 2;
 
 	return 1;
@@ -2139,8 +2148,7 @@ mark_lock_irq_enabled(struct task_struct
 
 static int
 mark_lock_irq_enabled_read(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
-			   int new_bit,
-			   int (*verbose)(struct lock_class *class))
+			   int new_bit)
 {
 	const char *name = state_name(new_bit);
 	const char *rname = state_rname(new_bit);
@@ -2170,44 +2178,24 @@ static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_str
 
 	switch(new_bit) {
 	case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ:
-		return mark_lock_irq_used_in(curr, this, new_bit,
-				hardirq_verbose);
 	case LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ:
-		return mark_lock_irq_used_in(curr, this, new_bit,
-				softirq_verbose);
 	case LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS:
-		return mark_lock_irq_used_in(curr, this, new_bit,
-				reclaim_verbose);
+		return mark_lock_irq_used_in(curr, this, new_bit);
 
 	case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ:
-		return mark_lock_irq_used_in_read(curr, this, new_bit,
-				hardirq_verbose);
 	case LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ:
-		return mark_lock_irq_used_in_read(curr, this, new_bit,
-				softirq_verbose);
 	case LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS_READ:
-		return mark_lock_irq_used_in_read(curr, this, new_bit,
-				reclaim_verbose);
+		return mark_lock_irq_used_in_read(curr, this, new_bit);
 
 	case LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ:
-		return mark_lock_irq_enabled(curr, this, new_bit,
-				hardirq_verbose);
 	case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ:
-		return mark_lock_irq_enabled(curr, this, new_bit,
-				softirq_verbose);
 	case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS:
-		return mark_lock_irq_enabled(curr, this, new_bit,
-				reclaim_verbose);
+		return mark_lock_irq_enabled(curr, this, new_bit);
 
 	case LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ:
-		return mark_lock_irq_enabled_read(curr, this, new_bit,
-				hardirq_verbose);
 	case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ:
-		return mark_lock_irq_enabled_read(curr, this, new_bit,
-				softirq_verbose);
 	case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ:
-		return mark_lock_irq_enabled_read(curr, this, new_bit,
-				reclaim_verbose);
+		return mark_lock_irq_enabled_read(curr, this, new_bit);
 
 	default:
 		WARN_ON(1);

-- 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-22 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-22 17:37 [RFC PATCH 00/19] lockdep series Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 01/19] lockdep: annotate reclaim context (__GFP_NOFS) Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 19:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 20:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-23  7:33       ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23  8:00         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-23 15:08           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 02/19] lockdep: sanitize bit names Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 03/19] lockdep: sanitize reclaim " Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 04/19] lockdep: lockdep_states.h Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 05/19] lockdep: simplify mark_held_locks Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 06/19] lockdep: simplify mark_lock() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 07/19] lockdep: move state bit definitions around Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 08/19] lockdep: generate the state bit definitions Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 09/19] lockdep: generate usage strings Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 10/19] lockdep: split up mark_lock_irq() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 11/19] lockdep: simplify the mark_lock_irq() helpers Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 12/19] lockdep: further simplify " Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 14/19] lockdep: merge the _READ " Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 15/19] lockdep: merge the !_READ " Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 16/19] lockdep: fully reduce mark_lock_irq() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 17/19] lockdep: simplify get_user_chars() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 18/19] lockdep: get_user_chars() redo Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-22 17:37 ` [RFC PATCH 19/19] lockdep: simplify check_prev_add_irq() Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090122174053.330242878@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.