Re: [lm-sensors] spam

[Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@ATrpms.net>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1298 bytes --]

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 03:41:10PM -0500, Jean-Marc Spaggiari wrote:
> 2009/1/26 Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@atrpms.net>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:15:33PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> >> Dear Line,
> >>
> >> On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:46:11 -0500, Pouchard, Line Catherine wrote:
> >> >  Dear list organisors:
> >> >
> >> > Is it possible to keep this kind of spam of the list?
> >>
> >> I have already asked our administrator (Axel, Cc'd) to erase this
> >> offending spam from our mailing list archive. And now, Axel, please
> >> _also_ remove this post from Line, as she quoted the message in its
> >> entirety :(
> >
> > Actually the spam was recogniyed at level 3.0, but the filters deny at
> > 5.0 and above. Maybe we should lower the spam barrier (which would hit
> > a couple of false positives, but better to get an email a month denied
> > than be spammed that way).
> 
> Hi Alex,
> 
> What appends to the blocked emails? Is there a place to check them and
> flag them as "non-spam" to have them sent to the list if needed?

Posts with a spam score of higher than 5.0 get stuck in the moderator
queue. But even if it were rejected at least the valid sender with a
false positive would notice and rephrase the posting.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors