All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@ATrpms.net>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] spam
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:18:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090129071846.GA1717@victor.nirvana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537C6C0940C6C143AA46A88946B8541710A4164D@ORNLEXCHANGE.ornl.gov>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1475 bytes --]

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:56:54AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:34:20 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:15:33PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > I have already asked our administrator (Axel, Cc'd) to erase this
> > > offending spam from our mailing list archive. And now, Axel, please
> > > _also_ remove this post from Line, as she quoted the message in its
> > > entirety :(
> > 
> > Actually the spam was recogniyed at level 3.0, but the filters deny at
> > 5.0 and above. Maybe we should lower the spam barrier (which would hit
> > a couple of false positives, but better to get an email a month denied
> > than be spammed that way).
> 
> Thanks for deleting the offending message. There's one more to delete
> here:
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2009-January/025201.html

That's a time consuming operation ... :/

> I've blacklisted that specific sender so hopefully we will no longer be
> harmed by similar message... as long as the sender doesn't change.
> 
> I am OK with lowering the spam barrier as long as the messages in
> question are either rejected or held for moderation, but not discarded.

I lowered the barrier to 3 instead of 5. But for example this spam
messages didn't get any high spam scoring to make it trigger any
filter (the previous one did).

If this continues, please consider making the list subscribers only.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-29  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-20 13:46 [lm-sensors] spam Pouchard, Line Catherine
2009-01-20 14:15 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-26 17:34 ` Axel Thimm
2009-01-26 20:41 ` Jean-Marc Spaggiari
2009-01-26 22:04 ` Axel Thimm
2009-01-27  8:10 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-27  8:56 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-27 12:31 ` Jean-Marc Spaggiari
2009-01-29  7:05 ` Axel Thimm
2009-01-29  7:18 ` Axel Thimm [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090129071846.GA1717@victor.nirvana \
    --to=axel.thimm@atrpms.net \
    --cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.