From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmalloc: Return NULL instead of link failure
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:37:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090127133723.46eb7035.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4975F376.4010506@suse.com>
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:53:26 -0500
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The SLAB kmalloc with a constant value isn't consistent with the other
> implementations because it bails out with __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much
> rather than returning NULL and properly allowing the caller to fall back
> to vmalloc or take other action. This doesn't happen with a non-constant
> value or with SLOB or SLUB.
>
> Starting with 2.6.28, I've been seeing build failures on s390x. This is
> due to init_section_page_cgroup trying to allocate 2.5MB when the max
> size for a kmalloc on s390x is 2MB.
>
> It's failing because the value is constant. The workarounds at the call
> size are ugly and the caller shouldn't have to change behavior depending
> on what the backend of the API is.
>
> So, this patch eliminates the link failure and returns NULL like the
> other implementations.
>
OK by me, is that's what the other sl[abcd...xyz]b.c implementations
do.
That __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much() thing has frequently been a PITA
anyway - some gcc versions flub the constant_p() test and end up
referencing __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much() when the callsite was
passing a variable `size' arg.
> - ---
> include/linux/slab_def.h | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> - --- a/include/linux/slab_def.h
> +++ b/include/linux/slab_def.h
> @@ -43,10 +43,7 @@ static inline void *kmalloc(size_t size,
> i++;
> #include <linux/kmalloc_sizes.h>
> #undef CACHE
> - - {
> - - extern void __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much(void);
> - - __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much();
> - - }
> + return NULL;
> found:
> #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> if (flags & GFP_DMA)
> @@ -77,10 +74,7 @@ static inline void *kmalloc_node(size_t
> i++;
> #include <linux/kmalloc_sizes.h>
> #undef CACHE
> - - {
> - - extern void __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much(void);
> - - __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much();
> - - }
> + return NULL;
> found:
> #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> if (flags & GFP_DMA)
>
Strange patch format, but it applied.
I'll punt this patch in the Pekka direction.
Do you think we should include it in 2.6.28.x?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmalloc: Return NULL instead of link failure
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:37:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090127133723.46eb7035.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4975F376.4010506@suse.com>
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:53:26 -0500
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The SLAB kmalloc with a constant value isn't consistent with the other
> implementations because it bails out with __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much
> rather than returning NULL and properly allowing the caller to fall back
> to vmalloc or take other action. This doesn't happen with a non-constant
> value or with SLOB or SLUB.
>
> Starting with 2.6.28, I've been seeing build failures on s390x. This is
> due to init_section_page_cgroup trying to allocate 2.5MB when the max
> size for a kmalloc on s390x is 2MB.
>
> It's failing because the value is constant. The workarounds at the call
> size are ugly and the caller shouldn't have to change behavior depending
> on what the backend of the API is.
>
> So, this patch eliminates the link failure and returns NULL like the
> other implementations.
>
OK by me, is that's what the other sl[abcd...xyz]b.c implementations
do.
That __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much() thing has frequently been a PITA
anyway - some gcc versions flub the constant_p() test and end up
referencing __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much() when the callsite was
passing a variable `size' arg.
> - ---
> include/linux/slab_def.h | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> - --- a/include/linux/slab_def.h
> +++ b/include/linux/slab_def.h
> @@ -43,10 +43,7 @@ static inline void *kmalloc(size_t size,
> i++;
> #include <linux/kmalloc_sizes.h>
> #undef CACHE
> - - {
> - - extern void __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much(void);
> - - __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much();
> - - }
> + return NULL;
> found:
> #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> if (flags & GFP_DMA)
> @@ -77,10 +74,7 @@ static inline void *kmalloc_node(size_t
> i++;
> #include <linux/kmalloc_sizes.h>
> #undef CACHE
> - - {
> - - extern void __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much(void);
> - - __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much();
> - - }
> + return NULL;
> found:
> #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> if (flags & GFP_DMA)
>
Strange patch format, but it applied.
I'll punt this patch in the Pekka direction.
Do you think we should include it in 2.6.28.x?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-27 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-20 15:53 [PATCH] kmalloc: Return NULL instead of link failure Jeff Mahoney
2009-01-27 21:37 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-01-27 21:37 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-27 21:44 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-01-27 21:44 ` Jeff Mahoney
2009-01-27 21:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-27 21:49 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090127133723.46eb7035.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.